Cited by 10Smoking Behavior and CessationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Education and Validation

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Text Message-Based Program for Smoking Cessation in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Colantonio, Lisandro D., Peña, Lorena, Whittaker, Robyn, Mejia, Raul M.·2016·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Few individual-level nonpharmacological interventions are available in Argentina to support smokers who attempt to quit. METHODS: We conducted a cross-cultural adaptation of Stop Smoking with Mobile Phones, an English text message-based tobacco cessation program, in Buenos Aires. The process included English-Spanish translation and back-translation, face validity checking by two local tobacco cessation experts, and a complete review using a structured questionnaire and discussion groups with potential users (current smokers who want to quit or former smokers who quit in the past 6 months). An editing group was responsible for analyzing information collected and preparing adapted messages. Readability of final messages was assessed. RESULTS: Tobacco cessation experts found translated messages suitable for the local setting, although mention of "mate" (a local infusion which can trigger cravings) was recommended. Review of messages by two potential users confirmed most of the messages would help smokers to quit and resulted in minor edits. Potential users who participated in two discussion groups (n = 17, 64.7% female, age range: 30-73) found the content of messages was relevant for cessation and related to their own experiences, although they suggested adding information regarding the negative consequences of smoking. Participants emphasized that messages should be formatted using voseo and informal style and provided feedback on specific words and expressions. Readability of final messages was easy/very easy (Fernández Huerta Index: 79.93). CONCLUSION: The cross-cultural adaptation of Stop Smoking with Mobile Phones resulted in relevant revisions for the study population, including tone, wording, and pertinent information (eg, smoking consequences). Local acceptability and effectiveness should be confirmed in future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntv061

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colantonio, L. D., Peña, L., Whittaker, R., & Mejia, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Center for the Study of State and Society (AR)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2015-03-19
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
314-320
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2058556668
Cited by
10
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
smoking cessation, text messaging, mobile health, cross-cultural adaptation, Spanish translation, mate, voseo, readability, non-pharmacological treatment, Buenos Aires
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Argentina, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Cell Phone, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review