Cited by 26Fatty Acid Research and HealthChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Paucity of evidence for a relationship between long-chain omega-3 fatty acid intake and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Fulton, Ashley S., Hill, Alison M., Williams, Marie T., Howe, Peter R.C., Coates, Alison M.·2015·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

Context The anti-inflammatory activity of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been established in several chronic inflammatory diseases but has yet to be demonstrated in inflammatory lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective The aim of this systematic review was to investigate, using PRISMA guidelines, the relationship between the intake of long-chain n-3 PUFAs and the prevalence, severity, and health outcomes of COPD. Data sources Eight health databases and the World Health Organization's international clinical trial registry were searched for relevant studies. Study selection Experimental or observational studies that were published in English and that assessed long-chain n-3 PUFA intake (by determining habitual consumption and/or tissue levels) in adults with COPD were included. Data extraction Publication demographics, participant characteristics, type of intervention or exposure, long-chain n-3 PUFA intake, pulmonary function, COPD mortality, and COPD severity were independently extracted from each article by 2 authors using a prospectively designed data extraction tool. Data synthesis All 11 of the studies included in the review were observational. Approximately equal numbers of studies reported significant (n = 6, 5 inverse) relationships or no significant relationships (n = 5) between either consumption of long-chain n-3 PUFAs or levels of long-chain n-3 PUFAS in tissue and a COPD outcome. Conclusions Current evid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nutrit/nuv017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulton, A. S., Hill, A. M., Williams, M. T., Howe, P. R. C., & Coates, A. M.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
612-623
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2253492990
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dietary intake, lung function, COPD severity, COPD mortality, anti-inflammatory activity, lung inflammation
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Fatty Acids, Unsaturated, Humans, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Prevalence, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review