The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the production and use of nanomaterials (NMs), particularly in the UK. Currently, relatively few companies in the UK are identifiable as NM manufacturers, the main emphasis being the bulk markets in metals and metal oxides, and some niche markets such as carbon nanotubes and quantum dots. NM manufacturing in the UK does not reflect the global emphasis on fullerenes, nanotubes and fibres. Some assumptions have been made about the types of NM that are likely to be imported into the UK, which currently include fullerenes, modified fullerenes and other carbon-based NMs including nanotubes. Many university departments, spin-offs and private companies have developed processes for the manufacture of NMs but may only be producing small quantities for research and development (R&D) purposes. However, some have the potential to scale up to produce large quantities. The nanotechnology industry in the UK has strong R&D backup from universities and related institutions. This review has covered R&D trends at such institutions, and appropriate information has been added to a searchable database. While several companies are including NMs in their products, only a few (e.g. manufacturers of paints, coatings, cosmetics, catalysts, polymer composites) are using nanoparticles (NPs) in any significant quantities. However, this situation is likely to change rapidly. There is a need to collect more information about exposure to NPs in both manufacturing and user scenarios. As the market grows, and as manufacturers switch from the micro- to the nanoscale, the potential for exposure will increase. More research is required to quantify any risks to workers and consumers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world
Piccinno, F., Gottschalk, F., Seeger, S., & Nowack, B. (2012) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9 · Cited by 1,280
The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles
Handy, R. D., von der Kammer, F., Lead, J. R., Hassellöv, M., Owen, R., & Crane, M. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8 · Cited by 916
Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead
Lambert, S., & Wagner, M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00149e · Cited by 838
Titanium Nanomaterial Removal and Release from Wastewater Treatment Plants
Kiser, M. A., Westerhoff, P., Benn, T., Wang, Y., Pérez-Rivera, J., & Hristovski, K. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901102n · Cited by 787
Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis
Handy, R. D., Henry, T. B., Scown, T. M., Johnston, B. D., & Tyler, C. R. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0205-1 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, M. Q., Boxall, A. B. A., & Hull, M.
- Venue
- Occupational Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 300-306
- ISSN
- 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8405
- OpenAlex
- W2135488990
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/occmed/kql051
- The paper
- Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, M. Q., Boxall, A. B. A., & Hull, M. (2006). Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. Occupational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.