The DOI matches its Crossref record.
982. Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Rezafungin
Open accessAbstract
Background: Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin antifungal being developed for treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis, and for prevention of invasive fungal diseases among immunosuppressed patients. In the Phase 2 and Phase 3 treatment trials of rezafungin compared with caspofungin (STRIVE [NCT02734862] and ReSTORE [NCT03667690], respectively), patients with severe hepatic impairment (HI) were not included due to lack of caspofungin data in this population. Rezafungin was previously evaluated in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. Here we report an open-label, single-dose study on rezafungin in patients with HI (Child-Pugh class C). Methods: To investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of RZF in subjects with HI and healthy subjects (HS), 8 subjects with HI and 8 HS matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were enrolled and received a single 400-mg intravenous 1-hour infusion of RZF. Plasma PK sampling was performed at various time points through 336 hours postdose. RZF PK parameters were derived using non-compartmental analysis. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: The majority of the HI subjects were White (87.5%) and male (75%) while equal distribution between White and Black or African American was observed among HS (50%) and 75% were male. The mean age of HI subjects was 58 years (range, 41–68 years) and 56.6 years (range, 50–61 years) for the HS. Mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m2 (range, 24.5–34.3 kg/m2) for HI subjects and 29.7 kg/m2 (range, 25.4–34.2 kg/m2) for the HS. RZF exposure (Cmax and AUC) in subjects with HI was ~30% lower than that in HS (Table 1), while half-life was generally similar (HI: 121 h, HS:124 h; Figure 1). Three HI subjects had one adverse event (AE) each (bronchitis, worsening hepatic encephalopathy, hyponatremia), all moderate in severity; one HS had 1 AE of infusion site infiltration mild in severity. No AEs were considered related to RZF, and all were resolved or resolving by the end of the study. Table 1. Plasma Rezafungin PK Parameter Estimates in Subjects with Severe Hepatic Impairment or Normal Hepatic Function After a Single 400 mg IV Infusion of Rezafungin Figure 1. Mean (+SD) Plasma Rezafungin Concentration-Time Profiles in Subjects with Severe Hepatic Impairment or Normal Hepatic Function After a Single 400-mg IV Infusion of Rezafungin (Semi-Logarithmic Scale) Conclusion: RZF was well tolerated in HI subjects and showed modestly reduced exposure that was within the range observed in matched HS. These findings support no RZF dose adjustment in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. Disclosures: Voon Ong, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Taylor Sandison, MD, MPH, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Rebeca M. Melara, M.S., Altasciences (contract research organization) (Employee) Thomas C. Marbury, MD, Orlando Clinical Research Center (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Equity owner of Orlando Clinical Research Center) Alena Jandourek, MD, Cidara therapeutics (Consultant) Shawn Flanagan, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacokinetic data and results of a phase 1 trial of rezafungin in hepatic impairment support no rezafungin dose adjustment.
“However, pharmacokinetic data and results of a phase 1 trial of rezafungin in hepatic impairment support no rezafungin dose adjustment. 28”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thompson, G. R., Soriano, A., Cornely, O. A., Kullberg, B. J., Kollef, M., Vazquez, J., Honore, P. M., Bassetti, M., Pullman, J., Chayakulkeeree, M., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02324-8 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huguet, J., Ong, V., Sandison, T., Melara, R. M., Marbury, T. C., Jandourek, A., & Flanagan, S.
- Affiliations
- Altasciences (Canada) (CA)
- Cidara Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- Orlando Clinical Research Center (US)
- San Diego, California
- Venue
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S582-S583
- ISSN
- 2328-8957 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8643917
- OpenAlex
- W4200361734
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- rezafungin, liver dysfunction, pharmacokinetics, echinocandins, Child-Pugh class C, drug safety, drug exposure reduction, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, immunocompromised patients, single-dose intravenous administration, adverse events, hepatic encephalopathy, hyponatremia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review