1718. Rezafungin Clinical Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 2 STRIVE Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: STRIVE was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of rezafungin (RZF), a novel echinocandin with pharmacokinetics allowing once weekly dosing and high, front-loaded plasma drug exposure, and to help determine dosing for a Phase 3 study. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with mycologically confirmed candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive RZF IV for up to 4 weeks dosed at either 400 mg weekly (Group 1) or 400 mg on week 1 and 200 mg weekly thereafter (Group 2), or standard of care (SOC; daily caspofungin [CSP] with optional criteria-defined oral stepdown after ≥3 days of IV therapy; Group 3). Safety and efficacy were evaluated by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and overall success at day 14 (1° endpoint; clinical cure + mycological success), investigator assessment of clinical cure, mycological success (in subjects with candidemia only), overall success in IC subjects only, and mortality. Outcomes at day 5 were also assessed. Results: The rate of TEAEs was 88.6% in Group 1, 94.4% in Group 2, and 81.8% in Group 3. Severe AEs occurred in 37.1%, 27.8%, and 39.4% of the groups, respectively. There were no concerning trends in System Organ Class groups, specific AEs, or laboratory abnormalities. The most common Candida species isolated was C. albicans (n = 45), followed by C. glabrata (n = 17), C. tropicalis (n = 15), and C. parapsilosis (n = 13). A high number of indeterminate responses due to missing data points in Group 1 led to analyses including and excluding the indeterminate responses. Overall, clinical, and mycological response rates at day 14 are shown in Table 1. Overall response at day 5 (Table 2) was highest in the RZF 400 mg/200 mg group, followed by the RZF 400 mg/400 mg and SOC groups. The overall mortality rate was 15.2% in Group 1, 9.7% in Group 2, and 17.9% in Group 3. Conclusion: RZF demonstrated safety and efficacy comparable to CSP in the treatment of candidemia/IC. There were no concerning trends in AEs. The efficacy rates were similar among all 3 treatment groups, trending higher with the RZF 400 mg/200 mg regimen on most efficacy outcomes, although the sample size is small and confirmation of these findings is required in a larger Phase 3 clinical trial. These findings support further clinical study of RZF in Phase 3. Disclosures: G. R. Thompson, Cidara: Investigator, Research support. Mayne: Investigator, Research support. Astellas: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Scynexis: Investigator, Research support. Vical: Consultant, Consulting fee. A. Soriano, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.: Investigator, Research grant. L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, Cidara Therapeutics: Grant Investigator, Research grant. K. Mena, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee, Salary. L. Navalta, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.: Employee, Salary. T. Sandison, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee, Salary. P. Pappas, Cidara Therapeutics: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Research grant. IMMY: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Research grant. Scynexis: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Research grant. Gilead: Grant Investigator, Research grant.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RZF can be dosed once weekly as an echinocandin for treatment or prevention in immunocompromised patients.
“RZF offers convenient, once-weekly dosing for echinocandin for the treatment or prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients.”
From Investigational Agents for the Treatment of Resistant Yeasts and Molds (2021) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Investigational Agents for the Treatment of Resistant Yeasts and Molds
Seiler, G. T., & Ostrosky-Zeichner, L. (2021) · Current Fungal Infection Reports · doi:10.1007/s12281-021-00419-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Thompson, G. R., Vazquez, J., Soriano, A., Skoutelis, A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Mena, K., Navalta, L., Sandison, T., & Pappas, P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Infectious Diseases, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia
- Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Evangelismos Hospital (GR)
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
- Cidara Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Venue
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- S52-S52
- ISSN
- 2328-8957 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6253007
- OpenAlex
- W2893944147
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- rezafungin, echinocandins, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, antifungal therapy, caspofungin, weekly dosing, treatment-emergent adverse events, clinical cure, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review