Cited by 2Religious Freedom and DiscriminationIslamic Studies and HistoryIslamic Thought and Society Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Punishment for Apostasy: Arguments from Two Traditionally Trained Muslim Scholars in Favor of its Abolition

Akbar, Ali·2021·Oxford Journal of Law and Religion

Abstract

This article explores and compares the views of two traditionally educated Muslim scholars, namely Taha Jabir al-Alwani (d 2016) and Hussein Ali Montazeri (d 2009), about the classical rulings on apostasy in Islam. The article argues that both al-Alwani, a Sunni scholar educated at al-Azhar, and Montazeri, a graduate of the Shiʿi seminary in Qom, defend freedom of religion in the sense of converting from Islam to another religion—an idea that stands in sharp opposition to the classical rulings on apostasy in Islamic sources which prescribe capital punishment for such an act. As the article demonstrates, these scholars’ views, despite certain differences in their method of argumentation, advance the development of new ideas about religious freedom in Islamic scholarship, especially among traditional circles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ojlr/rwab005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akbar, A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Akbar, Ali
Venue
Oxford Journal of Law and Religion
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
71-90
ISSN
  • 2047-0770 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-0789
OpenAlex
W3191252705
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
Keywords
apostasy, death penalty, religious freedom, Sunni scholars, Islamic jurisprudence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review