Cited by 10Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes Management and Research

Non-diabetic ketoacidosis associated with a low carbohydrate, high fat diet in a postpartum lactating female

Open access
Marzban, Saba, Arbee, Mohamed, Vorajee, Naseema, Richards, Guy A·2020·Oxford Medical Case Reports

Abstract

A 31-year old non-diabetic woman presented to our hospital with symptoms of dehydration, drowsiness, fatigue, shortness of breath and vomiting present for two consecutive days prior to admission. She had started a low carbohydrate, high fat (LCHF) diet to induce weight loss while breastfeeding her 4-month-old child 2 weeks prior to admission. The patient was found to have a severely high anion gap metabolic acidosis. It was determined to be due to ketoacidosis, which was as a result of carbohydrate restriction in the presence of increased metabolic demands related with the synthesis and secretion of milk. She denied alcohol use or ingestion of any drugs prior to admission. The patient underwent dialysis and received insulin, 5% dextrose water alongside a well-balanced diet with adequate calories. All abnormal laboratory results normalized and follow-up visits were done. Lactating women are at risk of developing ketoacidosis due to high metabolic demands of the body to produce milk. LCHF diets may exacerbate the body’s demand to meet its milk production requirement and result in ketoacidosis. Health professionals need to be aware of the complications of LCHF diet in this population to prevent mortality associated with this condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/omcr/omz026

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Ker ME Diabetic ketoacidosis: pathophysiology and clinical and laboratory presentation. Comp Cont Educ Pract 2001; 23: 220– 228.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marzban, S., Arbee, M., Vorajee, N., & Richards, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Clinical Pharmacy, Netcare Christiaan Barnard Memorial Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Clinical Haematology, Netcare Garden City Hospital, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Marzban, Saba
Venue
Oxford Medical Case Reports
Published
2020-08-01
Volume
2020
Issue
8
Pages
omz026-omz026
ISSN
2053-8855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048769077
Cited by
10
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford Medical Case Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
low-carbohydrate high-fat diet, ketogenic diet, lactation, postpartum women, anion gap metabolic acidosis, weight loss diet, dialysis, insulin therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review