Cited by 37Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Ultraconserved elements resolve the phylogeny and corroborate patterns of molecular rate variation in herons (Aves: Ardeidae)

Hruska, Jack P, Holmes, Jesse, Oliveros, Carl, Shakya, Subir, Lavretsky, Philip, McCracken, Kevin G, Sheldon, Frederick H, Moyle, Robert G·2023·Ornithology

Abstract

Thoroughly sampled and well-supported phylogenetic trees are essential to taxonomy and to guide studies of evolution and ecology. Despite extensive prior inquiry, a comprehensive tree of heron relationships (Aves: Ardeidae) has not yet been published. As a result, the classification of this family remains unstable, and their evolutionary history remains poorly studied. Here, we sample genome-wide ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and mitochondrial DNA sequences (mtDNA) of >90% of extant species to estimate heron phylogeny using a combination of maximum likelihood, coalescent, and Bayesian inference methods. The UCE and mtDNA trees are mostly concordant with one another, providing a topology that resolves relationships among the 5 heron subfamilies and indicates that the genera Gorsachius, Botaurus, Ardea, and Ixobrychus are not monophyletic. We also present the first genetic data from the Forest Bittern Zonerodius heliosylus, an enigmatic species of New Guinea; our results suggest that it is a member of the genus Ardeola and not the Tigrisomatinae (tiger herons), as previously thought. Finally, we compare molecular rates between heron clades in the UCE tree with those in previously constructed mtDNA and DNA–DNA hybridization trees. We show that rate variation in the UCE tree corroborates rate patterns in the previously constructed trees—that bitterns (Ixobrychus and Botaurus) evolved comparatively faster, and some tiger herons (Tigrisoma) and the Boat-billed Heron (Cochlearius)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ornithology/ukad005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hruska, J. P., Holmes, J., Oliveros, C., Shakya, S., Lavretsky, P., McCracken, K. G., Sheldon, F. H., & Moyle, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Hruska, Jack P
Venue
Ornithology
Published
2023-01-22
Volume
140
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2732-4613 (ISSN-L)
  • 0004-8038
OpenAlex
W4317704433
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 7
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Auk (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DEB-1557053)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
herons, ultraconserved elements, phylogeny, mitochondrial DNA, monophyly, Ardea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review