Cited by 11,159Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsGenetic diversity and population structure

Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7

Open access
Rambaut, Andrew, Drummond, Alexei J, Xie, Dong, Baele, Guy, Suchard, Marc A·2018·Systematic Biology

Abstract

Bayesian inference of phylogeny using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) plays a central role in understanding evolutionary history from molecular sequence data. Visualizing and analyzing the MCMC-generated samples from the posterior distribution is a key step in any non-trivial Bayesian inference. We present the software package Tracer (version 1.7) for visualizing and analyzing the MCMC trace files generated through Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Tracer provides kernel density estimation, multivariate visualization, demographic trajectory reconstruction, conditional posterior distribution summary, and more. Tracer is open-source and available at http://beast.community/tracer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sysbio/syy032

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., & Suchard, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Rambaut, Andrew
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2018-04-27
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
901-904
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2801159594
Cited by
11,159
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1393 · 2025: 1633 · 2024: 1602 · 2023: 1501 · 2022: 1638 · 2021: 1477 · 2020: 1236 · 2019: 574 · 2018: 95 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
301.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systematic Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1264153)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AI107034, U19 AI135995)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
tracers, Bayesian phylogenetics, kernel density estimation, multivariate data visualization, open source software
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Monte Carlo Method, Phylogeny, Software, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review