The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals
Abstract
Reprinted from the posthumous edition of 1777 and edited with introduction, comparative tables of contents, and analytical index by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Third edition with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making
(2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470752937 · Cited by 961
Mechanisms and the nature of causation
Glennan, S. (1996) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/bf00172853 · Cited by 894
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Hume, D.
- Venue
- David Hume: Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (Third Edition)
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1777-01-01
- Pages
- 1-1
- OpenAlex
- W1558275943
- Cited by
- 2,288
- References
- 0
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oseo/instance.00046349
- The paper
- Hume, D. (1777). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. David Hume: Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (Third Edition). https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00046349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
