Cited by 684Multilingual Education and PolicyLatin American and Latino StudiesLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies

Looking like a Language, Sounding like a Race: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad

Rosa, Jonathan·2019·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Looking like a Language, Sounding like a Race examines the emergence of linguistic and ethnoracial categories in the context of contemporary US constructions of Latinidad. The book draws from more than 24 months of ethnographic and sociolinguistic fieldwork to analyze the racialization of language as a central form of modern governance. It focuses specifically on youth socialization to US Latinidad as a contemporary site of political anxiety, “raciolinguistic” transformation, and urban inequity. Rosa’s account studies the fashioning of Latinidad in a highly segregated Chicago high school whose student body is more than 90% Mexican and Puerto Rican. Rosa shows how anxieties surrounding language, race, and identity produce an administrative project that seeks to transform “at risk” Mexican and Puerto Rican students into “Young Latino Professionals.” This institutional effort, which requires students to learn to be—and sound like—themselves in highly studied ways, reflects administrators’ attempts to navigate a precarious urban terrain in the city grappling with some of the nation’s highest youth homicide, drop-out, and teen pregnancy rates. Rosa explores the ingenuity of his researchers participants’ creative responses to these forms of marginalization through the contestation of political, ethnoracial, and linguistic borders. The detailed engagement with the relationship between linguistic and ethnoracial category-making that develops throughout the book points to the raciolinguistic, historical, political, and economic dynamics through which people come to look like a language and sound like a race across cultural contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racialized populations such as bilingual Afro-Latina women are perceived as speaking 'broken' Spanish and 'broken' English regardless of proficiency, leading to languagelessness.

    “As Rosa (2019) reminds us, racialized populations, such as bilingual Afro-Latina women, are perceived as speaking “broken” Spanish and “broken” English, regardless of proficiency, leading to what he called languagelessness, or a complete erasure of any linguistic legitimacy.”

    From Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá (2026) · cites this paper as Rosa (2019)

Authors
Rosa, J.
Corresponding author
Rosa, Jonathan
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2019-01-17
OpenAlex
W4251997285
Cited by
684
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 33 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
50.98
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Keywords
Latinidad, linguistic categories, Mexican American students, Puerto Rican students, high school students, youth socialization, urban segregation, urban inequality, juvenile homicide, adolescent pregnancy, school dropout, language policy, contested identity, Chicago

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review