CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Ancient Near East HistoryArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesBiblical Studies and Interpretation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Uruk Phenomenon

Selz, Gebhard J.·2020·The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780190687854.003.0004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The city of Uruk in southern Iraq was the main force for urbanization and state formation in Mesopotamia during the Uruk period (ca. 3800–3300 bc), which takes its name from this “first city.” This chapter discusses this formative period for the social, political, and cultural history of Mesopotamia and beyond, as well as the ensuing transitional period (Uruk III/Jemdet Nasr period; ca. 3300–3000 bc). The focus lies on the key elements of Uruk culture and its spread across Western Asia, including Syria, Anatolia, and Iran; the invention of cuneiform writing; and aspects of social, religious, and political organization of this emergent state. Contextualized in climatic, demographic, and geographic observations, the chapter evaluates key cultural features, stressing the role of population growth intertwined with technological, agricultural, and administrative improvements. These cultural features’ dissemination along trade routes to the Levant, Anatolia, and Iran is linked to the establishment of strongholds that secured the exchange of goods, with the south of Mesopotamia serving as the commercial hub. While the available sources—both textual and iconographic—provide no unequivocal evidence for the alleged monocratic governance of Uruk-period society, the identifiable political structures were strongly intertwined with religious functions, indicating great societal complexity. The alleged collapse of the Uruk culture was predominantly the breakdown of the Uruk (trade) network. Culturally, however, many features of the Uruk phenomenon provided the founding charter for Mesopotamian social structures in subsequent periods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780190687854.003.0004

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 167

  1. Abusch, T. 1981. Note on a pair of matching texts: a shepherd’s bulla and an owner’s receipt. In Morrison, M.A. and Owen, D.I. (eds.), Studies on the civilization and culture of Nuzi and the Hurrians: Festschrift E.R. Lacheman. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1–9.
  2. 1981, Heartland of cities
  3. 1972, The Uruk countryside
  4. 1982, Trade and politics in Proto-Elamite Iran., CA
  5. 1989, The Uruk expansion: cross-cultural exchange in early Mesopotamian civilization., CA
  6. 2005, The Sumerian takeoff., Structure and Dynamics
  7. Baines, J. 2012. Script, high culture, and administration in Middle Kingdom Egypt. In Houston, S.D. (ed.), The shape of script: how and why writing systems change. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, 25–63.
  8. 2015, CDLB
  9. 1998, Mesopotamien: Späturuk- und Frühdynastische Zeit
  10. 1993, Uruk: Kleinfunde I: Stein
  11. Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S. 2002. Reflections on the historiography of 4th millennium Mesopotamia. In Hausleiter, A., Kerner, S. and Müller-Neuhof, B. (eds.), Material culture and mental spheres: Rezeption archäologischer Denkrichtungen in der Vorderasiatischen Altertumskunde. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 171–204.
  12. 1984, Kalkstein für das urukzeitliche Uruk., BaM
  13. 1999, Uruk: Früheste Siegelabrollungen
  14. 1965, Bruchstücke einer archaischen Stele aus Uruk-Warka., Archäologischer Anzeiger
  15. 2007, Das Herrscherbild in Mesopotamien und Elam
  16. 2008, The ecology of the Mudhif., WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
  17. 2003, Les temps proto-urbains de Mésopotamie: contacts et acculturation à l’époque d’Uruk au Moyen-Orient
  18. 2016, Uruk-Kultur (culture urukéenne)., RlA
  19. 1993, Gilgamesh et Taureau de Ciel (šul-mè-kam) (Textes de Tell Haddad IV)., RA
  20. 2010, yen Collection
  21. Cooper, J.S. 2008. Incongruent corpora: writing and art in ancient Iraq. In Taylor, P. (ed.), Iconography without texts. London: Warburg Institute, 69–94.
  22. 2013, Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity
  23. 1993, Review of D. Schmandt-Besserat 1992., Rechtshistorisches Journal
  24. 1989, Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran, 1967–1975, vol. II: the Proto-Elamite texts from Tepe Yahya
  25. D’Anna, M.B. and Laurito, R. 2007. Comparing vessels against vessel imprints on the cretulae in room A340. In Frangipane M. (ed.), Arslantepe cretulae: an early centralised administrative system before writing. Rome: Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, 157–173.
  26. 2016, JAS-R
  27. 1933, Šumerisches Lexikon, Teil II: vollständige Ideogrammsammlung
  28. Dittmann, R. 1986. Seals, sealings and tablets: thoughts on the changing pattern of administrative control from the Late-Uruk to the Proto-Elamite period in Susa. In Finkbeiner, U. and Röllig, W. (eds.), Ğamdat Naṣr: period or regional style? Wiesbaden: Reichert, 332–366.
  29. Dittmann, R. 2002. Iran als Mittler zwischen Ost und West. In Hausleiter, A., Kerner, S. and Müller-Neuhof, B. (eds.), Material culture and mental spheres: Rezeption archäologischer Denkrichtungen in der Vorderasiatischen Altertumskunde. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 329–344.
  30. Dittmann, R. 2012. Multiple sealed hollow balls: a fresh look at the Uruk System almost thirty years later. In Baker, H.D., Kaniuth, K. and Otto, A. (eds.), Stories of long ago: Festschrift für Michael D. Roaf. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 69–89.
  31. Dittmann, R. 2013. Glyptic and patterns of urbanization: a humble approach. In Kämmerer, T. and Rogge, S. (eds.), Patterns of urban societies. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 35–137.
  32. 1998, Umm El-Qaab, I: das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse
  33. Dreyer, G. 1999. Motive und Datierung der dekorierten prädynastischen Messergriffe. In Ziegler, C. (ed.), L’art de l’Ancien Empire égyptien. Paris: La Documentation française, 195–226.
  34. 1997, Gudea and his dynasty
  35. 2007, Uruk: Architektur I: von den Anfängen bis zur frühdynastischen Zeit
  36. Eichmann, R. 2013. Frühe Grossarchitektur der Stadt Uruk. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 117–127.
  37. Eitel, B. 2013. Zur Entstehung früher Stadtkulturen: klimageschichtliche Aspekte. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 352–353.
  38. Emberling, G. 2010. Urban social transformations and the problem of the “first city”. In Smith, M.L. (ed.), The social construction of ancient cities. Washington, DC, and London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 256–268.
  39. 1993, Weitere Holzkohlen und Holzreste aus Uruk., BaM
  40. Englund, R.K. 1983b. Exotic fruits. In Potts, D.T. (ed.), Dilmun: new studies in the archaeology and early history of Bahrain. Berlin: Reimer, 87–89.
  41. 1993, Review of Schmandt-Besserat 1992., Science
  42. 1995, Review of Frayne 1992., OLZ
  43. Englund, R.K. 1998a. Texts from the Late Uruk Period. In Bauer, J., Englund, R.K. and Krebernik, M., Mesopotamien: Späturuk- und Frühdynastische Zeit. Fribourg: Academic Press & Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 13–233.
  44. 1998, Review of D. Schmandt-Besserat 1996., Written Language and Literacy
  45. 2001, Review of Charvát 1998., AfO
  46. 2009, The smell of the cage., CDLJ
  47. Feller, B. 2013. Die Anfänge der Bürokratie: Funktion und Einsatz von Siegeln im 4. und 3. Jahrtausend v. Chr. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 159–169.
  48. 1995, Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer
  49. 1986, Ğamdat Naṣr: period or regional style?
  50. Foster, C.P. 2012. The Uruk phenomenon: a view from the household. In Parker, B.J. and Foster, C.P. (eds.), New perspectives on household archaeology. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 438–472.
  51. 1988, Cultural developments at Arslantepe at the beginning of the third millennium., Origini
  52. 1975, A possible link between the Jemdet Nasr and the Umm an-Nar graves of Oman., Journal of Oman Studies
  53. 1995, The island of Umm an-Nar, 2: the third millennium settlement
  54. 2000, Hamoukar: early city in northeastern Syria., The Oriental Institute News and Notes
  55. Glassner, I.J. 2000. Les petits états mésopotamiens à la fin du 4e et au cours du 3e millénaire. In Hansen, M.H. (ed.), A comparative study of thirty city-state cultures. Copenhagen: Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 35–53.
  56. Gruber, M. 2015. “. . . somewhat smaller and shallower”: the development of Conical Bowls in third millennium Mesopotamia. In Dittmann, R., Selz, G.J. and Rehm, E. (eds.), It’s a long way to a historiography of the Early Dynastic period(s). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 129–167.
  57. 2002, Material culture and mental spheres: Rezeption archäologischer Denkrichtungen in der Vorderasiatischen Altertumskunde
  58. 1987, The archaeology of Western Iran
  59. 2004, Une archéologie des peuples du Proche-Orient, vol. 1: des peuples villageois aux cités-états (Xe–IIIe millénaire av. J.-C.)
  60. 1939, The Sumerian king list
  61. 1953, The myth of Inanna and Bilulu., JNES
  62. Johnson, G.A. 1987. The changing organization of Uruk administration on the Susiana Plain. In Hole, F. (ed.), The archaeology of Western Iran. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, 107–149.
  63. 1988, Late Uruk in Greater Mesopotamia., Origini
  64. 2016, The growth of early networks: new geochemical results of obsidian from the Ubaid to Chalcolithic period in Syria, Iraq and the Gulf., JAS-R
  65. 1995, Zur stilgeschichtlichen Einordnung der Gefäßfragmente Berlin ÄGM 15084/15693 und des Messers vom Gebel el-Arak., MDOG
  66. Krebernik, M. 1998. Die Texte aus Fāra und Tell Abū Ṣālabīḫ. In Bauer, J., Englund, R.K. and Krebernik, M., Mesopotamien: Späturuk- und Frühdynastische Zeit. Fribourg: Academic Press & Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 235–427.
  67. Krebernik, M. 2013. Die frühe Keilschrift und ihr Verhältnis zur Sprache. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 187–193.
  68. Kristiansen, K. 1991: Chiefdoms, states, and systems of social evolution. In Earle, T. (ed.), Chiefdoms: power, economy, and ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16–43.
  69. Lamprichs, R. 2002. Conflict and conflict management: some theoretical considerations. In Hausleiter, A., Kerner, S. and Müller-Neuhof, B. (eds.), Material culture and mental spheres: Rezeption archäologischer Denkrichtungen in der Vorderasiatischen Altertumskunde. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 143–150.
  70. 2017, Babylonia, the Gulf, and the Indus
  71. 2009, Listes lexicales et représentations spatiales
  72. 1960, XVI. vorläufiger Bericht über die von dem Deutschen Archäologischen Institut und der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft aus Mitteln der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unternommenen Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka, Winter 1957/58
  73. Liverani, M. 1996. Dal “piccolo regno” alla città-stato. In Acquaro, E. (ed.), Alle soglie della classicità: il Mediterraneo tra tradizione e innovazione. Studi in onore di Sabatino Moscati. Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 249–259.
  74. 2006, Uruk: the first city
  75. 2008, Excavations at Konar Sandal in the region of Jiroft in the Halil basin., Iran
  76. 1993, Cities, seals, and writing: seal impressions from Jemdet Nasr and Ur
  77. Matthews, R.J. 2013. Archaische Städtesiegel aus Mesopotamien und Iran. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 146–147.
  78. 233McMahon, A. 2013. Tell Brak, early northern Mesopotamian urbanism, economic complexity and social stress, fifth–fourth millennia bc. In Bonatz, D. and Martin, L. (eds.), 100 Jahre archäologische Feldforschungen in Nordost-Syrien: eine Bilanz. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 67–80.
  79. 2016, ‘Ubaid-Kultur, -Keramik., RlA
  80. Michalowski, P. 1993a. On the early toponymy of Sumer: a contribution to the study of early Mesopotamian writing. In Rainey, A.F. (ed.), kinatûtu ša dârāti: Raphael Kutscher Memorial Volume. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, 125–128.
  81. 1993, Tokenism., American Anthropologist
  82. 1998, SAAB
  83. Milano, L. and Tonietti, M.V. 2012. Cerimonialità alimentare ad Ebla: offerte, pasti, sacrifice. In Milano, L. (ed.), Mangiare divinamente: pratiche e simbologie alimentari nell’antico oriente. Florence: LoGisma, 33–81.
  84. 2009, Enmerkar und der Herr von Aratta: ein ungleicher Wettstreit
  85. Nissen, H.J. 1977. Aspects of the development of early cylinder seals. In Gibson, McG. and Biggs, R.D. (eds.), Seals and sealing in the ancient Near East. Malibu CA: Undena, 15–23.
  86. Nissen, H.J. 1980. The mobility between settled and non-settled in early Babylonia: theory and evidence. In Barrelet, M.-T. (ed.), L’archéologie de l’Iraq du debut de l’epoque néolithique à 333 avant notre ère: perspectives et limites de l’interprétation anthropologique des documents. Paris: CNRS, 285–290.
  87. 1983, Grundzüge einer Geschichte der Frühzeit des Vorderen Orients
  88. Nissen, H.J. 1993. The Early Uruk period: a sketch. In Frangipane, M. et al. (eds.), Between the rivers and over the mountains: archaeologica anatolica et mesopotamica Alba Palmieri dedicata. Rome: Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, 123–131.
  89. Nissen, H.J. 1995. Kulturelle und politische Netzwerke des 4. und 3. vorchristlichen Jahrtausends im Vorderen Orient. In Finkbeiner, U., Dittmann, R. and Hauptmann, H. (eds.), Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz: Zabern, 473–490.
  90. 1999, Geschichte Alt-Vorderasiens
  91. Nissen, H.J. 2002. Uruk: key site of the period and key site of the problem. In Postgate, N. (ed.), Artefacts of complexity: tracking the Uruk in the ancient Near East. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 15–23.
  92. 235Nissen, H.J. 2013. Die Erfindung und frühe Nutzung des Mediums Schrift in Mesopotamien. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 169–173.
  93. 1990, Frühe Schrift und Techniken der Wirtschaftsverwaltung im Alten Orient
  94. 1993, Archaic bookkeeping
  95. 1975, Das Mesopotamien der Frühkulturen in Abhängigkeit der nacheiszeitlichen Klimaschwankungen und Meeresspiegeländerungen., MDOG
  96. 1993, WA
  97. 1981, Testi lessicale monolingui della biblioteca L. 2769: materiali epigrafici di Ebla,
  98. Pittman, H. 2001. Mesopotamian intraregional relations reflected through glyptic evidence in the Late Chalcolithic 1–5 periods. In Rothman, M.S. (ed.), Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 403–443.
  99. Pollock, S. 2013. Differenzierung und Klassifizierung in Gesellschaften des 4. und 3. Jahrtausends. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 149–155.
  100. Pollock, S. 2015. Abu Salabikh: history of a southern Mesopotamian town. In Dittmann, R., Selz, G.J. and Rehm, E. (eds.), It’s a long way to a historiography of the Early Dynastic period(s). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 267–287.
  101. 1983, Dilmun: new studies in the archaeology and early history of Bahrain
  102. 1990, The Arabian Gulf in antiquity, vol. 1
  103. 2004, The Uruk explosion: more heat than light?, The Review of Archaeology
  104. Potts, D.T. 2013. Handel im frühen Alten Orient. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 255–261.
  105. Ramadan, J. 2015. Die Struktur der archaischen Texte und die Weiterentwicklung der Keilschriftzeichen. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 194−195.
  106. 2011, Hamoukar 2005–2010: revisiting the origins of urbanism in Syria., The Oriental Institute News and Notes
  107. 1991, Sealing systems on Uruk doors., BaM
  108. 1980, Das sumerische Kurzepos Gilgamesch and Akka
  109. 2001, Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation.
  110. 2004, JAR
  111. Rubio, G. 2005. On the linguistic landscape of early Mesopotamia. In Van Soldt, W. (ed.), Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia. Leiden: NINO, 316–332.
  112. Rubio, G. 2007. Writing in another tongue: alloglottography in the ancient Near East. In Sanders, S.S. (ed.), Margins of writing, origins of cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 33–70.
  113. 2007, Margins of writing, origins of cultures
  114. 1992, Before writing
  115. 1996, How writing came about
  116. 1982, Zur Verwendung der mesopotamischen “Glockentöpfe”., Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt
  117. 1988, Excavations at Karatut-Mevkii and perspectives on the Uruk-Jemdet Nasr expansion., Akkadica
  118. 1989, Comments (on Algaze 1989)., CA
  119. 1999, Paléorient 25
  120. 1998, Love songs in Sumerian literature
  121. Selz, G.J. 1991. “Elam” und “Sumer”: Skizze einer Nachbarschaft nach inschriftlichen Quellen der vorsargonischen Zeit. In De Meyer, L. and Gasche, H. (eds.), Mésopotamie et Elam. Ghent: University of Ghent, 27–43.
  122. Selz, G.J. 1998. Über mesopotamische Herrschaftskonzepte. In Dietrich, M. and Loretz, O. (eds.), Dubsar anta-men: Studien zur Altorientalistik; Festschrift für Willem H. Ph. Römer. Münster: Ugarit, 281–344.
  123. 1999, Wirtschaftskrise—Legitimationskrise—Staatskrise: zur Genese mesopotamischer Rechtsvorstellungen zwischen Planwirtschaft und Eigentumsverfassung., AfO
  124. 240Selz, G.J. 2002a. Political history: aspects of conflicts and their management in early Mesopotamia. In Hausleiter, A., Kerner, S. and Müller-Neuhof, B. (eds.), Material culture and mental spheres: Rezeption archäologischer Denkrichtungen in der Vorderasiatischen Altertumskunde. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 107–150.
  125. 2002, “Streit herrscht, Gewalt droht”: zu Konfliktregelung und Recht in der frühdynastischen und altakkadischen Zeit., WZKM
  126. 2010, Das Paradies der Mütter: Materialien zum Ursprung der “Paradiesvorstellungen”., WZKM
  127. Selz, G.J. 2013a. Trade posts and encampments as corner stones of exchange. In Kämmerer, T. and Rogge, S. (eds.), Patterns of urban societies. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 215–231.
  128. 2013, Staat, 1: Mesopotamien., RlA
  129. Selz, G.J. 2014a. Feeding the travellers: on Early Dynastic travel, travel networks and travel provisions in the frame of third millennium Mesopotamia. In Milano, L. (ed.), Paleonutrition and food practices in the ancient Near East. Padova: Sargon, 261–279.
  130. 1992, Das Messer vom Gebel el-Arak., BaM
  131. 1999, Rethinking world systems: diasporas, colonies, and interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia
  132. 1999, Paléorient 25
  133. 1994, Chiefdoms and early states in the Near East: the organizational dynamics of complexity
  134. 241Steinkeller, P. 1993. Early political development in Mesopotamia and the origin the Sargonic Empire. In Liverani, M. (ed.), Akkad, the first world empire: structure, ideology, traditions. Padova: Sargon, 107–129.
  135. Steinkeller, P. 1998. Inanna’s archaic symbol. In Braun, J., Łyczkowska, K., Popko, M. and Steinkeller, P. (eds.), Written on clay and stone: ancient Near Eastern studies presented to Krystyna Szarzyńska on the occasion of Her 80th birthday. Warsaw: Agade, 87–100.
  136. 2002, More on the archaic city seals., NABU
  137. 1978, Keramikproduktion in Ḥabūba Kabira-Süd: Untersuchungen zur Keramikproduktion innerhalb der späturukzeitlichen Siedlung Ḥabūba Kabira-Süd in Nordsyrien
  138. 1986, Archaische Keramik aus Uruk-Warka: die Keramik der Schichten XVI-VI aus den Sondagen “Tiefschnitt” und “Sägegraben” in Eanna, I., BaM
  139. Sürenhagen, D. 1986b. The dry-farming belt: the Uruk period and subsequent developments. In Weiss, H. (ed.), The origins of cities in dry-farming Syria and Mesopotamia in the third millennium bc. New York: Four Quarters, 7–45.
  140. 1986, Archaische Keramik aus Uruk-Warka: die Keramik der Schichten XVI-VI aus den Sondagen “Tiefschnitt” und “Sägegraben” in Eanna, II., BaM
  141. 1999, Untersuchungen zur relativen Chronologie Babyloniens und angrenzender Gebiete von der ausgehenden ʿUbaidzeit bis zum Beginn der Frühdynastisch-II-Zeit, 1: Studien zur Chronostratigraphie der südbabylonischen Stadtruinen von Uruk und Ur
  142. 2000, The cult of the goddess Inana in Archaic Uruk., Nin: Journal of Gender Studies in Antiquity
  143. 2009, Nomads, tribes, and the state in the ancient Near East
  144. Tirpan, S.B. 2013. Architectural spaces and hybrid practices in ancient northern Mesopotamia. In Card, J.J. (ed.), The archaeology of hybrid material culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 466–485.
  145. 1974, Über die protosumerische Schrift., Acta Antiqua
  146. 2011, Stiftmosaik., RlA
  147. Van Ess, M. 2013a. Uruk: die Forschungsgeschichte. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 95–101.
  148. Van Ess, M. 2013b. Neue Radiokarbondatierungen aus Uruk. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 362–363.
  149. 2016, Uruk, B: Archäologisch., RlA
  150. Van Ess, M. and Neef, R. 2013. Bauholz für Tempel. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 58–59.
  151. 2005, Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia
  152. 243Veldhuis, N. 2010. Guardians of tradition: Early Dynastic lexical texts in Old Babylonian copies. In Baker, H., Robson, E. and Zólyomi, G. (eds.), Your praise is sweet: a memorial volume for Jeremy Black. London: British Institute for the Study of Iraq, 379–400.
  153. Veldhuis, N. 2012. Cuneiform: changes and developments. In Houston, S.D. (ed.), The shape of the script: how and why writing systems change. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
  154. 2008, Wie man Macht macht: eine macht- und genderkritische Untersuchung der frühesten Repräsentationen von Staatlichkeit
  155. Vogel, H. 2013. Der “Grosse Mann von Uruk”: das Bild der Herrschaft im späten 4. und frühen 3. vorchristlichen Jahrtausend. In Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B. (eds.), Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 139–145.
  156. Wagensonner, K. 2009. Non-textuality in the ancient Near East: some glimpses from the Mesopotamian field. In Andrássy, P., Budka, J. and Kammerzell, F. (eds.), Non-textual marking systems, writing and pseudo-script from prehistory to modern times. Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie, 33–67.
  157. 2016, Die frühen lexikalischen Texte und ihr Aufbau: zu den archaischen und frühdynastischen Wortlisten, der Anordnung ihrer Einträge und den Klassifikationssystemen in den frühen Phasen der Keilschrift
  158. Westenholz, A. 2002. The Sumerian city-state. In Hansen, M.H. (ed.), A comparative study of six city-state cultures. Copenhagen: Reizels, 23–42.
  159. 244Wilcke, C. 1973. Politische Opposition nach sumerischen Quellen: der Konflikt zwischen Königtum und Ratsversammlung; Literaturwerke als politische Tendenzschriften. In Finet, A. (ed.), La voix de l’opposition en Mésopotamie. Bruxelles: Institut des Hautes Études de Belgique, 37–65.
  160. Wilcke, C. 2005. ED Lú A und die Sprache(n) der archaischen Texte. In Van Soldt, W. (ed.), Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia. Leiden: NINO, 430–445.
  161. Wilhelm, G. 2001. Der “Mann im Netzrock” und kultische Nacktheit. In Meyer, J.-W., Novak, M. and Pruß, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur vorderasiatischen Archäologie, Winfried Orthmann gewidmet. Frankfurt: Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, 478–483.
  162. 2003, Archaeological landscapes of the ancient Near East
  163. 2010, Visible language: inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond
  164. Woods, C. 2010b. The earliest Mesopotamian writing. In Woods, C. (ed.), Visible language: inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 33–50.
  165. Wrede, N. 1995. Relief einer Göttin oder Herrscherstatue? In Finkbeiner, U., Dittmann, R. and Hauptmann, H. (eds.), Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz: Zabern, 677–689.
  166. Wright, H.T. 2001. Cultural action in the Uruk world. In Rothman, M.S. (ed.), Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 123–147.
  167. 2016, JAS-R

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Selz, G. J.
Corresponding author
Selz, Gebhard J.
ORCID
Selz, Gebhard J.
Venue
The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Published
2020-10-22
Pages
163-244
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780190687854.003.0004
OpenAlex
W4250824312
Semantic Scholar
9450c4cf0a5e643d908575387940c368e88c1540
Cited by
36
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 29
FWCI
79.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Uruk period, Uruk, state formation, urbanization, cuneiform, Mesopotamian civilization, trade networks, population growth, religion and politics, Levant, Anatolia, Iran

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review