Authenticity, Digital Media, and Person Identity Verification
Abstract
Identity theory models authenticity as the outcome of person identity verification. In a parallel literature from digital media studies, the concept of authenticity has emerged as a central concern. Through interviews with American adults, I examine authenticity in relation to social media, using an identity theory frame. I show the specific tactics people use to present “true” versions of themselves, and how they censure those who fail to do so. Through participants’ narratives, I distill two principles of authenticity in a digital age: curation and triangulation. These refer to selective practices of sharing and cultivating a consistent image of self across digital platforms and face-to-face interactions. Those who fail to adhere to these principles may be subject to various forms of disconnection—“un-friending,” “un-following,” and/or general social exclusion. Disconnection minimizes interaction opportunities, making it difficult to verify person identity meanings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authenticity on the Internet mainly encompasses three dimensions: the integrity and origin of information, the authenticity of interactions, and the verification of identities.
“Authenticity on the Internet mainly encompasses three dimensions: the integrity and origin of information (Jacobs, 2024), the authenticity of interactions, and the verification of identities (Davis, 2019;Dietlin, Loomis, & Preffer, 2019).”
From Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery (2026) · cites this paper as Davis, 2019
Cites
Hogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
Identity Theory in a Digital Age
Davis, J. L. (2016) · New Directions in Identity Theory and Research · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457532.003.0006 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery
Alloing, C., Fournier, V., Reid, V., Germain, S., Turbide, O., & Yates, S. (2026) · International Journal of Communication · doi:10.65476/qd17zh66
- Authors
- Davis, J. L.
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Jenny L.
- ORCID
- Davis, Jenny L.
- Venue
- Identities in Everyday Life
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-05-29
- Pages
- 93-112
- OpenAlex
- W2959662323
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- authenticity, identity theory, social media, digital media, self-presentation, curation, triangulation, social exclusion, disconnection, online self-presentation, face-to-face interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review