Cited by 6Christian Theology and MissionIndian and Buddhist StudiesIndian History and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Keshab: Bengal's Forgotten Prophet

Open access
Stevens, John·2018·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Keshab Chandra Sen (1838-84) was one of the most powerful and controversial figures in nineteenth-century Bengal. A religious leader and social reformer, his universalist interpretation of Hinduism found mass appeal in India, and generated considerable interest in Britain. His ideas on British imperial rule, religion and spirituality, global history, universalism and modernity were all influential, and his visit to England made him a celebrity. Many Britons regarded him as a prophet of world-historical significance. Keshab was the subject of extreme adulation and vehement criticism. Accounts tell of large crowds prostrating themselves before him, believing him to be an avatar. Yet he died with relatively few followers, his reputation in both India and Britain largely ruined. As a representative of India, Keshab became emblematic of broad concerns regarding Hinduism and Christianity, science and faith, India and the British Empire. This innovative study explores the transnational historical forces that shaped Keshab's life and work. It offers an alternative religious history of empire, characterized by intercultural dialogue and religious syncretism. A fascinating and often tragic portrait of Keshab's experience of the imperial world, and the ways in which he carried meaning for his contemporaries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780190901752.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contradistinction to Subba Row, members of the Brahmo Samaj had criticized Mill's Examination for attempting to 'overpower God.'

    “In contradistinction to Subba Row, members of the Brahmo Samaj had criticized Mill's Examination for attempting to 'overpower God' (Stevens 2018: 97).”

    From Nothing Personal: Blavatsky and Her Indian Interlocutors (2021) · cites this paper as Stevens 2018: 97

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stevens, J.
Corresponding author
Stevens, John
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2018-06-01
OpenAlex
W4249184003
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
book
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Center for International and Regional Studies (Georgetown University) (submittedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Christian Theology and Mission
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Indian History and Philosophy
Keywords
Hinduism and Christianity, religious syncretism, science and religion, modernity, intercultural dialogue, avatars, nineteenth-century Bengal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review