The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of trade liberalization on tobacco consumption
Abstract
Over the past two decades, trade in tobacco and tobacco products bas expanded dramatically as a result of a variety of bilateral, regional, and international trade agreements that have significantly reduced trade barriers. This chapter provides a brief discussion of arguments derived from economic theory suggesting that the reductions in trade barriers will lead to greater competition, lower prices, and increased advertising and promotion in tobacco-product markets. This is followed by a review of recent trade agreements, highlighting features particularly relevant to tobacco. The limited empirical evidence on the impact of liberalized trade in tobacco products on their consumption is then discussed, followed by a new empirical analysis using data on 42 countries over the period from 1970 through 1995. This new analysis clearly demonstrates that trade liberalization has led to increases in cigarette smoking, with the most significant impact in low-income and middle-income countries. Finally, the globalization of the tobacco industry and global tobacco-control responses are briefly described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The globalisation of the tobacco industry means that tobacco is no longer a problem of specific countries or regions (Taylor, Chaloupka et al. 2000; Yach and Bettcher 2000; World Health Organisation 2001; World Health Organisation 2004).”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Taylor, Chaloupka et al. 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco
ANDERSON, P. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230600944446 · Cited by 151
Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Mamudu, H. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2009) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441690802095355 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, A., Chaloupka, F. F., Guindon, E., & Corbett, M.
- Venue
- Tobacco control in developing countries
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2000-08-10
- Pages
- 343-364
- OpenAlex
- W4388361608
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Keywords
- trade liberalization, tobacco use, cigarette smoking, trade barriers, tobacco advertising, tobacco prices, tobacco control, low-income countries, middle-income countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review