Cited by 135Mental Health and PsychiatryInnovations in Medical EducationPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Psychiatric Mental Status Examination

Trzepacz, Paula T, Baker, Robert W·1993

Abstract

Developed from years of teaching psychiatry to medical students and residents, this comprehensive text meets a need in the teaching of literature and will be valuable to both students first learning about the MSE and seasoned clinicians seeking an informative reference. The clinical relevance of mental status abnormalities is illustrated through frequent examples of disorders that can cause the particular signs and symptoms defined in each chapter. A final chapter describing fictional case histories with hypothetical examples of written mental status reports will be particularly useful for those learning to write such reports. This text is an important addition to the libraries of students and practitioners who work with psychiatric patients and should help to simplify and organize a challenging task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195062519.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kayi et al. showed that a distinct set of predictive features could accurately separate participants with schizophrenia from healthy controls in all language analysis categories.

    “They successfully showed a distinct set of predictive features that could accurately separate participants with schizophrenia from healthy controls in all of the language analysis categories.”
  • Kayi et al. found that combining semantic and pragmatic features gave the best accuracy, 81.7%, for classifying controls and participants with schizophrenia.

    “However, when using a combination of features and various machine learning classifiers (random forest and support vector machine), they found that utilizing a combination of the semantic and pragmatic features led to the most promising accuracy (81.7%) in classification of control participants and those with schizophrenia.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trzepacz, P. T., & Baker, R. W.
Published
1993-08-19
OpenAlex
W594724138
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.23
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
psychiatric assessment, mental illness, psychiatry teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review