Cited by 248Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFeminism, Gender, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict

Abstract

Given the political fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. Webster and the Court’s pending decisions in three more abortion cases, abortion rights promise to occupy centre stage in American politics for years to come. Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation, this timely work analyses the development of the pro-choice movement over the last twenty-five years, providing crucial background to the current abortion rights debate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195065961.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In local volunteer organizations, recreational and service-oriented outings activities are the products of highly committed activists.

    “in local volunteer organizations, these activities are the products of highly committed activists (Staggenborg 1991;McCarthy and Wolfson 1996; .001.Morris and Staggenborg 2004).”

    From Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work (2010) · cites this paper as Staggenborg 1991

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Staggenborg, S.
Corresponding author
Staggenborg, Suzanne
Published
1991-07-25
OpenAlex
W4388382529
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Social Issues
Keywords
pro-choice movement, abortion rights, abortion politics, Supreme Court abortion decisions, reproductive rights, political mobilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review