Cited by 851Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsSocial Science and Policy Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice

Abstract

This book introduces a new topic; a critical researched-based analysis of the role of human judgment in social policy formation. It applies what has been learned from research on human judgment to specific examples - from the Challenger disaster to present-day debates on health care. Human judgment can be a source of both hope and fear in the creation of social policy. Yet this important process has rarely been examined because research on human judgment has been scarce. Now, however, the results of 50 years of empirical work offer an unprecedented opportunity to examine human judgment and the basis of our hopes and fears. Numerous examples from law, medicine, engineering, and economics are used throughout to demonstrate these and other features of human judgment in action.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195097344.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 851

Metadata

Authors
Hammond, K. R.
Corresponding author
Hammond, Kenneth R
Published
1996-09-19
OpenAlex
W159586738
Cited by
851
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 60
FWCI
4.13
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
human judgment, social policy formation, policy making, cognitive biases, decision-making, Challenger disaster, health policy, public opinion, risk perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review