The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Affect, Memory, and Social Cognition
Abstract
Since time immemorial, philosophers, writers, and artists have sought to under stand how and why our feelings and emotions come to influence our memories, thoughts, and judgments. Indeed, clarifying the relationship between such basic mental faculties as affect, cognition, and conation remains a perennial goal in psychology (Hilgard, 1980). Surprisingly, most psychological research in this century proceeded on the implicit assumption that affect, cognition, and conation can be studied as separate, independent features of the human mind. Of the two paradigms that have dominated our discipline so far, neither behaviorism nor cognitivism have traditionally paid much attention to the study of affect. Early work exploring the links between affect and cognition relied either on psychoanalytic principles such as projection (Feshbach & Singer, 1957) or on conditioning theories (Clore & Byrne, 1974; Griffitt, 1970) to account for the apparent infusion of affectively valenced material into our memories, thoughts, and judgments. During the past decade or so, interest in the role of affect in cognition and behavior has increased dramatically. Contemporary theories are predominantly based on cognitive principles to explain affect infusion (Bower, 1981, 1991; Clore, Schwarz, & Conway, 1994; Fiedler, 1990,1991; Forgas, 1992b, 1995a, 1998a, 1998b, 1998c, Kruglanski, 1989). In this chapter, we discuss some of the influences of affective states on cognitive processes, especially those involved in memory and judgment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113
Exploring the roles of approach and avoidance in depression: An integrative model
Trew, J. L. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.007 · Cited by 316
The stability of parental bonding reports: a 20-year follow-up.
Murphy, E., Wickramaratne, P., & Weissman, M. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.003 · Cited by 100
Ballard, M. E., Gallo, D. A., & de Wit, H. (2013) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2924-5 · Cited by 32
Using and Being Used by Categories: The Case of Negative Evaluations and Daily Well-Being
Robinson, M. D., Vargas, P. T., Tamir, M., & Solberg, E. C. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00713.x · Cited by 23
X. Emotion and Desire in Self-Deception
Mele, A. R. (2003) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246100007955 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bower, G. H., & Forgas, J. P.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2000-08-24
- Pages
- 87-168
- OpenAlex
- W2898575742
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.