Cited by 100Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The stability of parental bonding reports: a 20-year follow-up.

Open access
Murphy, Eleanor, Wickramaratne, Priya, Weissman, Myrna·2010·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Addressing the long-term reliability of retrospectively assessed parenting is underscored by the well-documented association between parenting behaviors, and mood disorders in offspring. The rarity of longitudinal research with follow-up periods exceeding 10 years creates a need for additional studies.Methods 134 offspring of depressed and non-depressed parents were assessed on Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) scores, lifetime major depression (MDD), and current depressive symptoms at four waves across 20 years. PBI rank order and mean level stability, individual trajectories, and the impact of baseline age, gender, and lifetime MDD on stability, were obtained using multiple regression and linear mixed model analyses.Results Besides paternal overprotection which showed a 1.6-point average decrease, the PBI domains remained non-significant for mean level change over 20 years. However, there was a significant individual variation for all PBI domains. Lifetime MDD and age did not significantly impact retest correlations; older age at baseline was associated with higher average paternal overprotection. Sons had lower retest correlations than daughters, but did not differ from daughters on mean level stability. Current depressive symptoms were associated with PBI scores, but did not impact the effect of lifetime MDD, gender or age on mean level stability and individual trajectories.Limitations Small sample sizes and measuring lifetime MDD as present or absent may have restricted our ability to detect effects of MDD history on PBI stability.Conclusion The PBI is a robust measure of an important environmental risk for depressive disorders, and can be variably sensitive to sample characteristics, the passage of time and mood fluctuations. However, this sensitivity does not appear to significantly bias the long-term stability of this instrument.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.003

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, E., Wickramaratne, P., & Weissman, M.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Eleanor
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
125
Issue
1-3
Pages
307-315
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091158485
Cited by
100
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH036197, R01MH060912-S06, 5-T32 MH13043-34, R01MH060912, T32MH013043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
parental bonding, Parental Bonding Instrument, test-retest reliability, long-term stability, paternal overprotection, offspring depression, gender differences, age effects, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Major Depressive Disorder, Father-Child Relations, Female, Humans, Individuality, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Child of Impaired Parents, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review