The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World
Abstract
David Brion Davis has long been recognized as the leading authority on slavery in the Western World. His books have won every major history award--including the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award--and he has been universally praised for his prodigious research, his brilliant analytical skill, and his rich and powerful prose. Now, in Inhuman Bondage, Davis sums up a lifetime of insight in what Stanley L. Engerman calls "a monumental and magisterial book, the essential work on New World slavery for several decades to come." Davis begins with the dramatic Amistad case, which vividly highlights the international character of the Atlantic slave trade and the roles of the American judiciary, the presidency, the media, and of both black and white abolitionists. The heart of the book looks at slavery in the American South, describing black slaveholding planters, the rise of the Cotton Kingdom, the daily life of ordinary slaves, the highly destructive internal, long-distance slave trade, the sexual exploitation of slaves, the emergence of an African-American culture, and much more. But though centered on the United States, the book offers a global perspective spanning four continents. It is the only study of American slavery that reaches back to ancient foundations (discussing the classical and biblical justifications for chattel bondage) and also traces the long evolution of anti-black racism (as in the writings of David Hume and Emmanuel Kant, among many others). Equally important, it combines the subjects of slavery and abolitionism as very few books do, and it illuminates the meaning of nineteenth-century slave conspiracies and revolts, with a detailed comparison with 3 major revolts in the British Caribbean. It connects the actual life of slaves with the crucial place of slavery in American politics and stresses that slavery was integral to America's success as a nation--not a marginal enterprise. A definitive history by a writer deeply immersed in the subject, Inhuman Bondage offers a compelling narrative that links together the profits of slavery, the pain of the enslaved, and the legacy of racism. It is the ultimate portrait of the dark side of the American dream. Yet it offers an inspiring example as well--the story of how abolitionists, barely a fringe group in the 1770s, successfully fought, in the space of a hundred years, to defeat one of human history's greatest evils.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While some scholars look beyond the example of transatlantic enslavement in conceptualising the institution more broadly (Brion Davis 2006; Finley 1998; Patterson 2018), its position as a paradigm is rarely questioned.”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Brion Davis 2006
In the citing paper
“Despite the attribution of sub-human status, the legal status of slavery was never as simplistic as the categorisation of enslaved persons as simply chattel in law to the exclusion of the recognition of their humanity -the laws of man had to recognise human status in ways that chattel could never hold status (Brion Davis 2006, p 36; Davis 1949, p 64).”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Brion Davis 2006, p 36
In the citing paper
“most scholars agree that the decision to carry out a revolt was a rare occurrence (Davis 2006; Genovese 1992; Rucker 2007; Weik 2012).”
From An Archaeology of Struggle: Material Remnants of a Double Consciousness in the American South and Danish Caribbean Communities (2019) · cites this paper as Davis 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Human Trafficking in the United States
Logan, T., Walker, R., & Hunt, G. (2008) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838008327262 · Cited by 240
Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence
Rai, T. S., Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705238114 · Cited by 214
Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge
Goodman, M., & Short, J. L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13559-0_6 · Cited by 190
Sustainability Transformations
Linnér, B., & Wibeck, V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108766975 · Cited by 188
Snaza, N. (2013) · Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/15505170.2013.783889 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, D. B.
- Corresponding author
- Davis, David Brion
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- OpenAlex
- W4388392605
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Colonial Brazil
- Keywords
- slavery in the United States, transatlantic slave trade, abolitionism, Southern United States, cotton kingdom, slave life, African American culture, anti-Black racism, slave revolts, slave conspiracies, David Hume, Immanuel Kant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review