The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manu’s Code Of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmásāstra
Abstract
Abstract Manu ’s Code of Law is one of the most important texts in the Sanskrit canon, indeed one of the most important surviving texts from any classical civilization. It paints an astoundingly detailed picture of ancient Indian life-covering everything from the constitution of the king ’s cabinet to the price of a ferry trip for a pregnant woman-and its doctrines have been central to Indian thought and practice for 2000 years. Despite its importance, however, until now no one has produced a critical edition of this text. As a result, for centuries scholars have been forced to accept clearly inferior editions of Sanskrit texts and to use those unreliable editions as the basis for constructing the history of classical India. In this volume, Patrick Olivelle has assembled the critical text of Manu, including a critical apparatus containing all the significant manuscript variants, along with a reliable and readable translation, copious explanatory notes, and a comprehensive introduction on the structure, content, and socio-political context of the treatise. The result is an outstanding scholarly achievement that will be an essential tool for any serious student of India.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In short, all human impurity can be blamed on the womb. 40”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s
Davidson, R. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x13000943 · Cited by 8
Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism
Paris Langenberg, A. (2015) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfv059 · Cited by 6
Blood Lines: Biopolitics, Patriarchy, Myth
Yelle, R. A. (2024) · Open Theology · doi:10.1515/opth-2024-0011
Metadata
- Authors
- Olivelle, P.
- Affiliations
- With the editorial assistance of Suman Olivelle
- Corresponding author
- Olivelle, Patrick
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2004-12-09
- OpenAlex
- W4388388487
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Manusmriti, ancient Indian law, critical edition, manuscript variants, classical India
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review