The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Corporate Social Responsibility?: Why Now? How?
Abstract
There may have been a time when “social responsibility” meant truly caring in both symbolic and material ways for one’s fellow human beings—across the backyard fence, at the community center, in church, or at the bowling ally—but a realistic review of history suggests that those communal ties have been uneven and unstable now, and in fact, we may simply be witnessing what Bellah, Madsen, Sullivan, Swidler, and Tipton (1985) describe as the “latest phase of that process of separation and individuation that modernity seems to entail” (p. 275). Certainly, America was colonized by those who had “come loose” from the old European structures, and yet the colonists brought with them notions of social obligation and group formation that served to ground communal life in the new land.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While some rejections are based on empirical evidence, others draw more generally on suppositions about modern organizations and their inherent inability to fulfill societal concerns (e.g., McMillan, 2007;Roberts, 2003).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as McMillan, 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcmillan, J. J.
- Corresponding author
- Mcmillan, Jill J
- ORCID
- Mcmillan, Jill J
- Venue
- The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2007-04-12
- Pages
- 15-29
- OpenAlex
- W4388151908
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, history of social responsibility, modernity, individualization, community ties, social obligations, American colonialism, business ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review