Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 96Public Administration and GovernanceAdministrative Law and GovernancePolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State

Abstract

Political theorists are aware that the old-fashioned model of state power, according to which elected officials make policy decisions, which are then faithfully enacted by a loyal cadre of public servants, is hopelessly outdated. The complexity of the modern state, not to mention the difficulty of the economic and social problems it confronts, is such that a great deal of rule-making power is delegated to public servants. Yet if public servants are not merely in the business of administration, but are also deciding questions of policy, how are they making these decisions, and what normative principles inform their judgments? The Machinery of Government attempts to answer this question. The central challenge involves reconciling the tension between the traditional commitment to political neutrality on the part of the civil service with the fact that administrative discretion inevitably involves making normative judgments. State employees are in many cases unable to do their jobs effectively without some conception of where the public interest lies. It seems inevitable that this will conflict with the commitment to political neutrality, since this conception of the public interest may be tension with that of elected officials. The solution to the dilemma lies in an understanding of the constraints that liberalism imposes on popular sovereignty in a liberal-democratic polity. Not only do courts play an important role in checking the power of democratic publics, the executive bra…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Heath, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Heath, Joseph
Published
2020-08-20
OpenAlex
W4237008288
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
11.55
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
administrative discretion, civil service, political neutrality, public interest, rulemaking, liberalism, popular sovereignty, executive branch, liberal democracy, normative judgment, separation of powers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001
The paper
Heath, J. (2020). The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.