The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategy and Structure: Understanding Online Disinformation and How Commitments to “Free Speech” Complicate Mitigation Approaches
Abstract
The pervasive spread of disinformation online is a critical societal issue, limiting our ability to respond to collective challenges such as pandemics and climate change. This essay defines disinformation as intentional, misleading but often built around a true or plausible core, and functioning as a campaign rather than a single piece of content. Online disinformation exploits social media and other information systems (both online and off) in complex ways, and disinformation can become embedded in the structures of online ecosystems. Disinformation is participatory, incorporating unwitting crowds of sincere believers who routinely amplify and even produce false and misleading narratives. The essay explores how our commitments to freedom of speech complicate the challenge of addressing disinformation. The strategies of disinformation have long exploited freedom of speech to manipulate democratic discourse and justify their actions. Examining the history of these strategies reveals the persistent challenge of addressing disinformation while preserving our democratic commitments to free speech. Finally, the essay offers a few suggestions regarding how platforms can navigate these challenges, focusing on the structural dimensions and attending to the participatory dynamics of disinformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252247 · Cited by 2,156
Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action
Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257995 · Cited by 1,597
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration
Bourgeois, L. J. (1980) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257802 · Cited by 1,041
Parkhe, A. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258759 · Cited by 959
Metadata
- Authors
- Starbird, K.
- Venue
- Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2022-08-12
- Pages
- 213-230
- OpenAlex
- W4293755513
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy and Structure: Understanding Online Disinformation and How Commitments to “Free Speech” Complicate Mitigation Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780197621080.003.0013
- The paper
- Starbird, K. (2022). Strategy and Structure: Understanding Online Disinformation and How Commitments to “Free Speech” Complicate Mitigation Approaches. Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197621080.003.0013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.