The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Messy" Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures
Abstract
Dramatic advances have recently marked the study of international joint ventures (IJVs). The progress has been mixed, however. Although several theoretical dimensions have been emphasized in the literature, researchers have not addressed certain crucial questions at the heart of the IJV relationship. Consequently, individually useful IJV studies have not coalesced into a collectively coherent body of work with an underlying theoretical structure. This weakness in theory development, I argue, may stem from the convergence of “hard” methodological approaches with “soft” behavioral variables. In proposing and justifying a research program toward deeper understanding of voluntary interfirm cooperation. I offer a theoretical framework for IJVs, develop a typology of theory-development approaches, and apply this framework and typology to demonstrate how a near-term shift in foci can accelerate rigorous IJV theory development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859
Parkhe, A. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256759 · Cited by 2,698
Self-citationLearning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures
Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.306 · Cited by 976
Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118 · Cited by 793
Partnering Across Borders: Negotiating Organizational Culture in a German-Japanese Joint Venture
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. E. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700534001 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Parkhe, A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062526333
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Messy" Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258759
- The paper
- Parkhe, A. (1993). "Messy" Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.