Cited by 751Anthropological Studies and InsightsArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesCultural and Mythological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology

Gell, Alfred·1992·Anthropology Art and Aesthetics

Abstract

The complaint is commonly heard that art is a neglected topic in present-day social anthropology, especially in Britain. The marginalization of studies of primitive art, by contrast to the immense volume of studies of politics, ritual, exchange, and so forth, is too obvious a phenomenon to miss, especially if one draws a contrast with the situation prevailing before the advent of Kalinowski and Radcliffe-Brown. But why should this be so? I believe that it is more than a matter of changing fashions in the matter of selecting topics for study; as if by some collective whim, anthropologists had decided to devote more time to cross-cousin marriage and less to mats, pots, and carvings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198277330.003.0003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Gell, A.
Corresponding author
Gell, Alfred
Venue
Anthropology Art and Aesthetics
Published
1992-09-24
Pages
40-63
OpenAlex
W4388336338
Cited by
751
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
Keywords
enchantment, technology, primitive art, Radcliffe-Brown, material culture, anthropology of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review