Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Development of Reference Priors*

Berger, James O, Bernardo, José M·1992·Bayesian Statistics 4

Abstract

The paper begins with a general, though idiosyncratic, discussion of noninformative priors. This provides the background for motivating the recent and ongoing elaborations of the reference prior method for developing noninformative priors, a method initiated in Bernardo (1979). Included in this description of the reference prior method is a new condition that has not previously appeared. Motivation for this new condition is found, in part, in the Fraser, Monette, Ng (1985) example. Extensive discussion of the motivation for reference priors and the specific steps in the algorithm are given, with reference to new examples where appropriate. Also, technical issues in implementing the algorithm are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198522669.003.0003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Berger, J. O., & Bernardo, J. M.
Venue
Bayesian Statistics 4
Published
1992-08-13
Pages
35-60
OpenAlex
W4388289852
Cited by
287
References
0
FWCI
3.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Development of Reference Priors*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780198522669.003.0003
The paper
Berger, J. O., & Bernardo, J. M. (1992). On the Development of Reference Priors*. Bayesian Statistics 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198522669.003.0003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.