Cited by 392Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceNeural Networks and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Bayesian approach for neural networks—review and case studies

Lampinen, Jouko, Vehtari, Aki·2001·Neural Networks

Abstract

We give a short review on the Bayesian approach for neural network learning and demonstrate the advantages of the approach in three real applications. We discuss the Bayesian approach with emphasis on the role of prior knowledge in Bayesian models and in classical error minimization approaches. The generalization capability of a statistical model, classical or Bayesian, is ultimately based on the prior assumptions. The Bayesian approach permits propagation of uncertainty in quantities which are unknown to other assumptions in the model, which may be more generally valid or easier to guess in the problem. The case problem studied in this paper include a regression, a classification, and an inverse problem. In the most thoroughly analyzed regression problem, the best models were those with less restrictive priors. This emphasizes the major advantage of the Bayesian approach, that we are not forced to guess attributes that are unknown, such as the number of degrees of freedom in the model, non-linearity of the model with respect to each input variable, or the exact form for the distribution of the model residuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00098-8

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lampinen, J., & Vehtari, A.
Corresponding author
Lampinen, Jouko
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
257-274
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040355924
Cited by
392
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tekes
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
Bayesian neural networks, prior knowledge, error propagation, generalization, regression analysis, classification, inverse problems, model complexity, residual distribution, error reduction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review