The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online
Open accessAbstract
Online anarchy? Far from it: as this study convincingly shows, norms matter online. In a tour de force, internet law expert Matthias C. Kettemann analyses the genesis, ontology, and legitimation of rule and rules on the internet. Innovatively, the study establishes the emergence of a normative order of the internet, an order that integrates norms materially and normatively connected to the use and development of the internet at three different levels (regional, national, international), of two types (privately and publicly authored), and of different character (from ius cogens to technical standards). Centrifugal forces contribute to normative redundancies (“normative froth”), real conflicts of norms between regulatory layers and geographically bounded normative spheres (“normative friction”), substantial structural problems (“normative fractures”), and political, commercial, and technological fragmentation of the internet. But these forces of normative disorder can be countered. As the study impressively shows, a normative turn has taken place on the internet. The rules on rule-making that have developed within the normative order of the internet explain, predict, and legitimize the creation of new norms through processes of self-learning normativity. These norms are then assessed for their internal coherence, consonance with other order norms, and consistency with the order’s finality. The normative order of the internet is based on and produces a liquefied system characterized by self-learning normativity. Thus a theory of normativity (“of the law”) that goes back to Kant needs to be fundamentally rethought: with norm-based self-organization as the principle of life that enables the transcendental constitution of normativityon the internet.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“TOSCO includes all ISPs that started by providing Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), a second-gener ation standard, on the African continent and, hence, provides a near-complete image of those companies providing internet access to individual customers in Africa. 64”
From Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
Citations
Cited by
European Union’s Regulating of Social Media: A Discourse Analysis of the Digital Services Act
Schlag, G. (2023) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v11i3.6735 · Cited by 44
Cong, W., & Thumfart, J. (2022) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac059 · Cited by 24
Back up: can users sue platforms to reinstate deleted content?
Kettemann, M. C., & Tiedeke, A. S. (2020) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2020.2.1484 · Cited by 21
Self-citationThe ‘China’ Question in Mobile Internet Standard-Making: Insights From Expert Interviews
Nanni, R. (2021) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102151 · Cited by 23
Hung, H.-T. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00346-8 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kettemann, M. C.
- Corresponding author
- Kettemann, Matthias C.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- OpenAlex
- W4205345666
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Evolving Legal Systems and Governance
- Keywords
- normative order, internet governance, rulemaking, internet fragmentation, jus cogens, technical standards, self-organization, legitimation of rule
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780198865995.001.0001
- The paper
- Kettemann, M. C. (2020). The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865995.001.0001