The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past
Abstract
Margarita Diaz-Andreu offers an innovative history of archaeology during the nineteenth century, encompassing all its fields from the origins of humanity to the medieval period, and all areas of the world. The development of archaeology is placed within the framework of contemporary political events, with a particular focus upon the ideologies of nationalism and imperialism. Diaz-Andreu examines a wide range of issues, including the creation of institutions, the conversion of the study of antiquities into a profession, public memory, changes in archaeological thought and practice, and the effect on archaeology of racism, religion, the belief in progress, hegemony, and resistance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Across the globe, archaeology has been used to justify imperialism, the displacement of Native Americans and Indigenous peoples from their lands, scientific racism, ethnocentrism, and xenophobic nationalism”
From The Future is Now: Archaeology and the Eradication of Anti-Blackness (2020) · cites this paper as Diaz-Andreu 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Future is Now: Archaeology and the Eradication of Anti-Blackness
Franklin, M., Dunnavant, J. P., Flewellen, A. O., & Odewale, A. (2020) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-020-00577-1 · Cited by 140
Gänger, S. (2009) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417509990107 · Cited by 25
Reilly, M. C. (2022) · Archaeological Dialogues · doi:10.1017/s1380203822000174 · Cited by 20
Tantaleán, H. (2022) · Latin American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/laq.2021.45 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Diaz-Andreu, M.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2007-11-22
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
