The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Writings In General Linguistics
Abstract
Ferdinand de Saussure's Cours de linguistique générale was posthumously composed by his students from the notes they had made at his lectures. The book became one of the most influential works of the twentieth century, giving direction to modern linguistics and inspiration to literary and cultural theory. Before he died Saussure told friends he was writing up the lectures himself but no evidence of this was found. Eighty years later in 1996 a manuscript in Saussure's hand was discovered in the orangerie of his family house in Geneva. This proved to be the missing original of the great work. It is published now in English for the first time in an edition edited by Simon Bouquet and Rudolf Engler, and translated and introduced by Carol Sanders and Matthew Pires, all leading Saussure scholars. The book includes an earlier discovered manuscript on the philosophy of language, Saussure's own notes for lectures, and a comprehensive bibliography of major work on Saussure from 1970 to 2004. It is remarkable that for eighty years the understanding of Saussure's thought has depended on an incomplete and non-definitive text, the sometimes aphoristic formulations of which gave rise to many creative interpretations and arguments for and against Saussure. Did he, or did he not, see language as a-social and a-historical? Did he, or did he not, rule out the study of speech within linguistics? Was he a reductionist? These disputes and many others can now be resolved on basis of the work now published. This reveals new depth and subtetly in Saussure's thoughts on the nature and complex workings of language, particularly his famous binary oppositions between form and meaning, the sign and what is signified, and language (langue) and its performance (parole).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This aligns with Saussure's notion that meaning arises from relations and context rather than inherent properties [35].”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The power of PowerPoint: A visual perspective on meaning making in strategy
Knight, E. R. W., Paroutis, S., & Heracleous, L. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2727 · Cited by 119
Software evolution and maintenance
Rajlich, V. (2014) · Future of Software Engineering (FOSE) · doi:10.1145/2593882.2593893 · Cited by 101
Hanks, W. F., & Severi, C. (2014) · Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/hau4.2.001 · Cited by 94
Shepherd, H. R. (2011) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01227.x · Cited by 85
Drawing out culture: productive methods to measure cognition and resonance
McDonnell, T. E. (2014) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-014-9224-5 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Saussure, F. D.
- Corresponding author
- Saussure, Ferdinand de
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2006-07-27
- OpenAlex
- W4388352398
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Keywords
- Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, philosophy of language, langue and parole, form and meaning, signifier and signified, binary oppositions, reductionism, history of linguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review