The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural selection for learnability: three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable
Abstract
Here is a far-reaching and vitally important question for those seeking to understand the evolution of language: given a thorough understanding of whatever cognitive processes are relevant to learning, understanding, and producing language, would such an understanding enable us to predict the universal features of language? This question is important because, if met with an affirmative answer, then an explanation for why language evolved to exhibit certain forms and not others must be understood in terms of the biological evolution of the cognitive basis for language. After all, such an account pivots on the assumption that properties of the cognitive mechanisms supporting language map directly onto the universal features of language that we observe. We argue against this position, and note that the relation between language universals and any cognitive basis for language is opaque.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children may appear pre-adapted to decipher the rules of syntax in part because languages have evolved to have rules that are easy to learn.
“Children may appear pre-adapted to decipher the rules of syntax in part because languages have evolved to have rules that are easy to learn (Deacon, 1997; Brighton et al., 2005).”
From The origins of language in teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Brighton et al., 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure
Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016 · Cited by 557
Self-citationThe origins of language in teaching
Laland, K. N. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Brighton, H., Kirby, S., & Smith, K.
- Venue
- Language Origins
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2005-05-26
- Pages
- 291-309
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review