CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80Language and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 60 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The origins of language in teaching

Open access
Laland, Kevin N.·2017·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7PMC PMC5325857
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

I introduce seven criteria for determining the validity of competing theories for the original function of language. I go on to present a novel explanation that meets all the criteria: language originally evolved to teach kin. I suggest that the use of symbols subsequently generated evolutionary feedback at two levels, in the form of self-modified selection pressures that favored structures in the mind that functioned to manipulate and use symbols with efficiency, and cultural selection on languages for learnability.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Laland proposes that language originally evolved to teach kin, arguing this hypothesis uniquely satisfies seven criteria for a valid account of language origins. The account links teaching, cumulative culture, and subsequent gene–culture coevolution and cultural selection for learnability.

Key findings

  • The paper introduces seven criteria for evaluating theories of language’s original function: honesty, cooperativeness, adaptive from the outset, symbol grounding, generality, uniqueness, and why communication needed to be learned.
  • It argues that “language originally evolved to teach kin” meets all seven criteria, whereas no other published hypothesis does so to the author’s knowledge.
  • Language is presented as a cheap and accurate teaching tool that extends the range of teachable phenomena, including abstract concepts, past/future events, and distant objects.
  • The paper proposes evolutionary feedback at two levels: self-modified selection pressures favoring minds that manipulate symbols efficiently, and cultural selection on languages for learnability.
  • It cites Morgan et al. (2015) as experimental archaeology evidence that stone tool making transmission improves with teaching, particularly with language, across six measures, but not with imitation or emulation.

Methods

  • Theoretical/conceptual paper: compiles seven criteria from Szamado & Szathmary (2006), Bickerton (2009), and one added by the author, then evaluates competing language-origin scenarios against them.
  • Uses existing comparative, developmental, archaeological, and mathematical modeling literature to support the teaching-kin hypothesis.
  • No new primary data are collected or analyzed; the argument is a selective-scenario hypothesis about the original function of language.

Limitations

  • The author states it is “difficult though it is to be totally confident about any account of the selective scenario that originally favored language.”
  • The author explicitly notes the account “solely addresses the issue of the original function of language” and says little to nothing about how vocal learning, generative computations, semantic or phonological representations, their interfaces, or externalization evolved.
  • Evident from the text: the hypothesis is not directly empirically tested here; support comes from applying criteria and interpreting existing literature.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

8 of 60 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Theory and experimentation shows that socially sanctioned punishment is a more effective means of preserving cooperation than individual-level punishment.

    “which theory and experimentation shows is a more effective means of preserving cooperation than individual-level punishment (Fehr & Gachter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fehr & Gachter, 2002 source

      The Results (p. 2) show that cooperation was higher when individuals could punish other group members than when punishment was unavailable. The paper does not compare socially sanctioned punishment with individual-level punishment, so it does not support the claimed relative effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Fehr & Fischbacher 2003 source

      The review article (p. 2) says anticipated third-party punishment deters non-cooperation, and the discussion on p. 6 describes models in which punishment helps maintain cooperation. It does not establish that socially sanctioned punishment is more effective than individual-level punishment; the Figure 4 comparison instead concerns which behaviours can be punished. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Language may have coevolved with cultural complexity as a means of facilitating and enhancing socially transmitted life-skill acquisition in young hominins.

    “then language may have coevolved with cultural complexity as a means of facilitating and enhancing socially transmitted life-skill acquisition in young hominins (Csibra & Gergely, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Csibra & Gergely, 2011 source

      Section 4 (page not available) proposes that natural pedagogy evolved alongside technological and social changes that made children’s learning more demanding, and that communicative demonstrations can help transmit complex skills. It does not specifically propose that language coevolved with cultural complexity for this purpose; it distinguishes natural pedagogy from language and emphasizes that communication can be non-verbal. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    High-fidelity information transmission is necessary for cumulative culture.

    “Theoretical analyses have established that high-fidelity information transmission is necessary for cumulative culture (Lewis & Laland, 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lewis & Laland, 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    Cumulative culture that ratchets up in complexity and diversity over time is unique to humans.

    “While social learning is widespread in animals, cumulative culture that ratchets up in complexity and diversity over time is unique to humans (Dean et al., 2012, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dean et al., 2012, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Teaching through language, once started, could be applied to multiple difficult-to-learn proficiencies, including extractive foraging procedures, food-processing methods, and hunting skills.

    “Teaching through language, once started, could be applied to multiple difficult-to-learn proficiencies, including extractive foraging procedures, food-processing methods, and hunting skills.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 3

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A recent experimental archaeology study demonstrated that, across six measures, the transmission of stone tool making improves with teaching, and particularly with language, but not with imitation or emulation.

    “Consistent with this hypothesis, a recent experimental archaeology study demonstrated that, across six measures, the transmission of stone tool making improves with teaching, and particularly with language, but not with imitation or emulation (Morgan et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morgan et al., 2015 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This research shifts some of the explanatory burden for language away from natural selection for language-specific cognitive adaptations, and makes the challenge of explaining the origins of language more manageable.

    “This research is important, as it shifts some of the explanatory burden for language away from natural selection for language-specific cognitive adaptations, and makes the challenge of explaining the origins of language more manageable (Smith and Kirby, 2008; Kirby et al., 2007, 2008, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Smith and Kirby, 2008 source
    • cites Kirby et al., 2007 source
    • cites Kirby et al., 2008 source

      The paper’s opening discussion presents cultural transmission as another approach to explaining linguistic structure, and its Conclusions report that structure emerged through cultural evolution in laboratory languages. This supports the idea of an alternative explanation, but the paper does not establish that natural selection for language-specific cognitive adaptations bears less explanatory burden or that explaining the origins of language as a whole is more manageable. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Both transmission-chain experiments and mathematical models show how languages propagated culturally evolve in such a way as to maximize their own transmissibility, becoming easier to learn and more structured over time.

    “Likewise, both transmission-chain experiments and mathematical models show how languages propagated culturally evolve in such a way as to maximize their own transmissibility, becoming easier to learn and more structured over time (Kirby et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kirby et al., 2008 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    With trade comes negotiation, and selection for still more developed communication.

    “With the evolution of language, trade becomes a possibility, whilst with trade comes negotiation, and selection for still more developed communication (Pagel, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pagel, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cultural practices are typically transmitted amongst close relatives, are deployed to exploit difficult-to-access but nutrient-rich foodstuffs, and are challenging to learn, making them precisely those traits that would benefit from teaching.

    “Cultural practices are typically transmitted amongst close relatives, are deployed to exploit difficult-to-access but nutrient-rich foodstuffs, and are challenging to learn, making them precisely those traits that would benefit from teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Cultural practices are typically transmitted amongst close relatives.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Teaching is rare in nature but universal in human societies.

    “Defined in this way, teaching is rare in nature, but universal in human societies (Tomasello, 1999; Gergely & Csibra, 2005; Gergely et al., 2007; Csibra, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tomasello, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gergely & Csibra, 2005 source
    • cites Gergely et al., 2007 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Trade requires some capacity to agree a rate of exchange, which would be very difficult without at least proto-language, or through the flexible use of shared gesture.

    “Trade seemingly requires some capacity to agree a rate of exchange, something that would be very difficult without at least proto-language, or through the flexible use of shared gesture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The explanation meets all seven criteria required of a successful account of language origins, something that no other hypothesis has done.

    “The explanation meets all seven of the criteria required of a successful account of language origins, something that, to my knowledge, no other hypothesis has done.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No published hypothesis for the original function of language meets all seven criteria.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The use of symbols subsequently generated evolutionary feedback at two levels: self-modified selection pressures favoring mind structures for efficient symbol manipulation, and cultural selection on languages for learnability.

    “I suggest that the use of symbols subsequently generated evolutionary feedback at two levels, in the form of self-modified selection pressures that favored structures in the mind that functioned to manipulate and use symbols with efficiency, and cultural selection on languages for learnability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Language extends the range of phenomena that can be taught, allowing knowledge of abstract concepts to be imparted, as well as instruction about the past and future, and distant events or objects.

    “In addition, language extends the range of phenomena that can be taught, allowing knowledge of abstract concepts to be imparted, the understanding of which may significantly enhance the pupil's performance, as well as instruction about the past and future, and distant events or objects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Language is a character that simultaneously increases the effectiveness and reduces the costs of teaching.

    “Language is such a character.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Mathematical analyses show stringent conditions that must be met for teaching to evolve, but cumulative culture relaxes these conditions.

    “Mathematical analyses reveal stringent conditions that must be met for teaching to evolve, but show that cumulative culture relaxes these conditions (Fogarty et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fogarty et al., 2011 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Teaching and cumulative culture coevolved in our ancestors, creating the first species that taught relatives across a broad range of contexts.

    “This implies that teaching and cumulative culture coevolved in our ancestors, creating for the first time in the history of life on earth a species that taught their relatives across a broad range of contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Other apes do not have functionally referential alarm calls, and their gestures are neither deployed referentially nor exhibit symbolic or conventionalized features.

    “Other apes do not have functionally referential alarm calls (Hauser, 1996), and their gestures are neither deployed referentially nor exhibit symbolic or conventionalized features (Pika et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hauser, 1996 source
    • cites Pika et al., 2005 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Selective feedback from language would have operated at two levels: a gene-culture coevolutionary dynamic, where human cultural activities generate natural selection favoring enhanced language learning and transmission capabilities, and a cultural evolution dynamic, whereby human cultural activities feed back to affect the learned properties of the language.

    “Selective feedback from language would have operated at two levels, a gene-culture coevolutionary dynamic, where human cultural activities generate natural selection favoring enhanced language learning and transmission capabilities, but also a cultural evolution dynamic, whereby human cultural activities feed back to affect the learned properties of the language.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Words have highly restricted meanings until they are strung together, but in combination, underpinned by a mutually understood set of combinatorial rules, they are capable of communicating highly complex messages.

    “Words have highly restricted meanings until they are strung together, but in combination, underpinned by a mutually understood set of combinatorial rules, they are capable of communicating highly complex messages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Important elements of infant-directed speech, such as infants' sensitivity to its linguistic features, or adults' tendency to engage in behavior that elicits rewarding responses from infants (e.g. smiles), have been favoured through a biological evolutionary process.

    “Important elements of infant-directed speech, such as infants’ sensitivity to its linguistic features, or adults’ tendency to engage in behavior that elicits rewarding responses from infants (e.g. smiles), have been favoured through a biological evolutionary process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Studies have shown that infants prefer to listen to infant-directed speech, that it is more effective in getting infants' attention, and that it helps infants to learn words faster, compared to standard speech.

    “Studies have shown that infants prefer to listen to this type of speech, that it is more effective in getting and infants’ attention, and that it helps infants to learn words faster, compared to standard speech (Thiessen et al., 2005; Fitch, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Thiessen et al., 2005 source
    • cites Fitch, 2010 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Infant-directed speech is typically slower and higher in pitch than regular speech, and uses shorter and simpler words.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Other cooperative contexts struggle to meet the honesty and adaptive from outset criteria, and hence cannot be how language got started.

    “However, other cooperative contexts struggle to meet the honesty and adaptive from outset criteria described above, and hence cannot be how language got started.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Children are known to hear some linguistic structures selectively and to ignore others, a phenomenon that may have generated selection for language structure that is "child friendly".

    “Children are known to hear some linguistic structures selectively and to ignore others, a phenomenon that may have generated selection for language structure that is “child friendly” (Deacon, 1997; Falk, 2004; Fitch, 2004, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Deacon, 1997
    • cites Falk, 2004 source
    • cites Fitch, 2004 source

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With this syntax came not just full-blown language, but an almost infinite flexibility in usage.

    “With this syntax came not just full-blown language, but an almost infinite flexibility in usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Selective feedback from language would likely have made a big difference both to the scale of human cooperation that ensued, and to the potency of human language.

    “Such selective feedback would likely have made a big difference both to the scale of human cooperation that ensued, and to the potency of human language (Pagel, 2012), plausibly helping to explain how early language extended into domains in which honesty could not be assumed, and vigilance against malevolence or incompetence was required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pagel, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The selective feedback from symbolic manipulation to the human mind likely extends far beyond the acquisition of a capacity to extract meanings and comprehend syntax.

    “What is more, the selective feedback from symbolic manipulation to the human mind likely extends far beyond the acquisition of a capacity to extract meanings and comprehend syntax.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Language probably began as a means of reducing the costs of teaching complex foraging skills, but will have become coopted to teaching linguistic symbols too.

    “Language probably began as a means of reducing the costs of teaching complex foraging skills, but will have become coopted to teaching linguistic symbols too.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Human ability to infer meaning is partly attributable to pedagogical activities of the transmitter, and an enhanced capability to extract meaning through observation of others' activities in the receiver is also likely.

    “While this ability is partly attributable to the aforementioned pedagogical activities of the transmitter, an enhanced capability to extract meaning through observation of others’ activities in the receiver is also likely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Syntax alleviates this burden by breaking up the message hierarchically and recursively into meaningful and readily comprehensible chunks, phrases and clauses, that the brain can easily and quickly process, and by introducing rules that eradicate ambiguities.

    “Syntax alleviates this burden by breaking up the message hierarchically and recursively into meaningful and readily comprehensible chunks, phrases and clauses, that the brain can easily and quickly process, and by introducing rules that eradicate ambiguities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: If words are simply strung together without syntax then ambiguities over their collective meaning rapidly arise, creating a heavy processing burden on the receiver.
26 of 26

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No published hypothesis for the original function of language meets all seven criteria.

    “To my knowledge, there is no published hypothesis for the original function of language that meets all seven of these criteria.”
    “something that, to my knowledge, no other hypothesis has done.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The seven criteria have never been fully compiled and have not been applied in unison.

    “but to my knowledge such criteria have never been fully compiled, and have not been applied in unison.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early communication was initially restricted to that which was taught.

    “Provided early communication was initially restricted to that which was taught, the interests of transmitter and receiver are broadly aligned.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cultural practices are typically transmitted amongst close relatives.

    “Cultural practices are typically transmitted amongst close relatives, are deployed to exploit difficult-to-access but nutrient-rich foodstuffs, and are challenging to learn, making them precisely those traits that would benefit from teaching.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Complex coordinated actions are often difficult to bring off without a means to teach, or tell, individuals what their specific roles should be.

    “Complex coordinated actions are often difficult to bring off without a means to teach, or tell, individuals what their specific roles should be.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Our ancestors lived in kin-structured groups.

    “In the kin-structured groups exhibited by our ancestors, early language, initially selected as an adjunct to the teaching of young by parents or siblings, could subsequently spread to teaching more distant relatives.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Collective foraging, scavenging and hunting required coordinated activity amongst multiple individuals.

    “This expansion would have been particularly relevant to activities such as collective foraging, scavenging and hunting, which required coordinated activity amongst multiple individuals.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    If words are simply strung together without syntax then ambiguities over their collective meaning rapidly arise, creating a heavy processing burden on the receiver.

    “If words are simply strung together without syntax then ambiguities over their collective meaning rapidly arise, creating a heavy processing burden on the receiver.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Infant-directed speech is typically slower and higher in pitch than regular speech, and uses shorter and simpler words.

    “Infant-directed speech is typically slower and higher in pitch than regular speech, and uses shorter and simpler words.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Humans possess a mind uniquely fashioned to acquire and process information linguistically.

    “Chomsky described language as the main engine of thought, and there is now little doubt that humans possess a mind uniquely fashioned to acquire and process information linguistically.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Same article is attributed to different lead authors

    Minor

    These references give the same title, journal, volume, pages, and identifiers, but list different lead authors for what appears to be the same article.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The coevolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.
  2. Deacon, T. W. (2003). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.
  3. Power, C. (1998). Old wives’ tales: The gossip hypothesis and the reliability of cheap signals. In J. R. Hurford (Ed.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 111–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Reader, S.M. (2000). Social learning and innovation. Individual differences, diffusion dynamics and evolutionary issues. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.
  5. Schenker, N. M., Hopkins, W. D., Spocter, M. A., Garrison, A. R., Stimpson, C. D., Erwin, J. M. … Sherwood, C. C. (2010). Broca’s area homologue in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Probabilistic mapping, asymmetry and comparison to humans. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 730–742. · DOI
  6. Waterson, M. (1978). The development of communication. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Laland, K. N.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Laland, Kevin N.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
225-231
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
DOI
10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7
PMC
PMC5325857
OpenAlex
W2465905408
Cited by
80
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7
FWCI
43.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (40128)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
origin of language, language evolution, symbolic communication, cultural selection, language learnability
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Humans, Language, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review