The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers?
Abstract
As Chapter 1 described, the origins of agriculture have been debated by archaeologists for most of the discipline’s history. The topic has been a particular focus of archaeological field and laboratory research from the middle of the twentieth century onwards. The number of suggested causes that has been proposed over the years for why prehistoric foragers might have become farmers appears almost endless, with everybody joining the party including the lunatic fringe (Table 10.1)! The main course of scholarly debate, though, has been conditioned partly by changing theoretical currents in archaeological thinking and perceptions of present-day or recent foraging and farming societies (Chapter 2) and partly by the application of improved methodologies (Chapter 3). In the regional studies that form the core of this book, I have concentrated primarily on the archaeological evidence left by prehistoric foragers and farmers, in all its richness, from stones to bones to rock art to starch grains (and more besides), though I have also made reference to the contributions of the several other disciplines that have contributed to the debate, including anthropology, ecology, ethnoarchaeology, genetics, geomorphology, linguistics, and palynology (pollen analysis). The next sections briefly review the principal themes that have emerged from those studies, as the basis for some concluding reflections on whether it is possible or desirable to arrive at an overarching explanation or set of explanations for why foragers became farmers. South-West Asia has probably been the focus of more debate on discussions about the origins of agriculture than anywhere else in the world. On the present evidence what can clearly be recognized as the Eurasian system of mixed farming (the cultivation of wheat and barley and the herding of sheep and goats) seems to have developed in this region very early in the Holocene. It underpinned the dramatic development of PPNB villages in and around the ‘hilly flanks’ of the Fertile Crescent some 1,000 years into the Holocene, c.8500 BC. The parts of South-West Asia where these villages came into being were also places where wild cereals, sheep, and goats were naturally located.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the drop of the male Ne during the mid-Holocene corresponds to a change in the archaeological record characterized by the spread of Neolithic cultures, demographic changes, as well as shifts in social behavior (Barker 2006).”
From A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture (2015) · cites this paper as Barker 2006
Citations
Cited by
A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture
Karmin, M., Saag, L., Vicente, M., Sayres, M. A. W., Järve, M., Talas, U. G., Rootsi, S., Ilumäe, A.-M., Mägi, R., Mitt, M., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186684.114 · Cited by 485
Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru
Dillehay, T. D., Rossen, J., Andres, T. C., & Williams, D. E. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141395 · Cited by 273
The chronostratigraphy of the Haua Fteah cave (Cyrenaica, northeast Libya)
Douka, K., Jacobs, Z., Lane, C., Grün, R., Farr, L., Hunt, C., Inglis, R. H., Reynolds, T., Albert, P., Aubert, M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.10.001 · Cited by 145
Self-citationCultivation of cereals by the first farmers was not more productive than foraging.
Bowles, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010733108 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, G.
- Venue
- The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2006-10-05
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780199281091.003.0015
- The paper
- Barker, G. (2006). The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers? The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199281091.003.0015