Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru
Abstract
The early development of agriculture in the New World has been assumed to involve early farming in settlements in the Andes, but the record has been sparse. Peanut ( Arachis sp.), squash ( Cucurbita moschata ), and cotton ( Gossypium barbadense ) macrofossils were excavated from archaeological sites on the western slopes of the northern Peruvian Andes. Direct radiocarbon dating indicated that these plants grew between 9240 and 5500 14 C years before the present. These and other plants were recovered from multiple locations in a tropical dry forest valley, including household clusters, permanent architectural structures, garden plots, irrigation canals, hoes, and storage structures. These data provide evidence for early use of peanut and squash in the human diet and of cotton for industrial purposes and indicate that horticultural economies in parts of the Andes took root by about 10,000 years ago.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some agricultural systems developed at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia, South America, and North China, whereas others took place closer to 6,000-7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China and perhaps central America.
“Some developed at the Pleistocene–Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia (60, 64), South America (65, 66), and North China (67), whereas others took place closer to 6,000–7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China (68) and perhaps central America (cf. 69).”
From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Dillehay, T. D., Rossen, J., Andres, T. C., & Williams, D. E.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Agriculture (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dillehay, Tom D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2007-06-29
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 5833
- Pages
- 1890-1893
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1982807603
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Keywords
- ancient agriculture, groundnut, squash, cotton, Arachis, Cucurbita moschata, Gossypium barbadense, macrofossils, radiocarbon dating, tropical dry forest, domestication, pre-Columbian Andes, northern Peru
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Archaeology, Gossypium, Fossils, Arachis, Peru, Seeds, Crops, Agricultural, Cucurbita, History, Ancient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review