Cited by 273Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru

Dillehay, Tom D., Rossen, Jack, Andres, Thomas C., Williams, David E.·2007·Science

Abstract

The early development of agriculture in the New World has been assumed to involve early farming in settlements in the Andes, but the record has been sparse. Peanut ( Arachis sp.), squash ( Cucurbita moschata ), and cotton ( Gossypium barbadense ) macrofossils were excavated from archaeological sites on the western slopes of the northern Peruvian Andes. Direct radiocarbon dating indicated that these plants grew between 9240 and 5500 14 C years before the present. These and other plants were recovered from multiple locations in a tropical dry forest valley, including household clusters, permanent architectural structures, garden plots, irrigation canals, hoes, and storage structures. These data provide evidence for early use of peanut and squash in the human diet and of cotton for industrial purposes and indicate that horticultural economies in parts of the Andes took root by about 10,000 years ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1141395

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some agricultural systems developed at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia, South America, and North China, whereas others took place closer to 6,000-7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China and perhaps central America.

    “Some developed at the Pleistocene–Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia (60, 64), South America (65, 66), and North China (67), whereas others took place closer to 6,000–7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China (68) and perhaps central America (cf. 69).”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 273

Authors
Dillehay, T. D., Rossen, J., Andres, T. C., & Williams, D. E.
Affiliations
United States Department of Agriculture (US)
Corresponding author
Dillehay, Tom D.
Venue
Science
Published
2007-06-29
Volume
316
Issue
5833
Pages
1890-1893
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1982807603
Cited by
273
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
ancient agriculture, groundnut, squash, cotton, Arachis, Cucurbita moschata, Gossypium barbadense, macrofossils, radiocarbon dating, tropical dry forest, domestication, pre-Columbian Andes, northern Peru
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Archaeology, Gossypium, Fossils, Arachis, Peru, Seeds, Crops, Agricultural, Cucurbita, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review