Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Contribution of Species Distribution Modelling to Conservation Prioritization

Elith, Jane, Leathwick, John·2009·Spatial Conservation Prioritization

Abstract

This chapter provides information on species distribution models (SDMs) and their use in conservation prioritization. In it we aim to give readers an understanding of the breadth of methods and applications of SDM, and to equip them to identify and resolve key decisions in creating a robust model. Our primary objectives are to describe the main methodological steps required to fit and evaluate an SDM, and to summarize the most common problems with SDMs in the context of spatial prioritization, pointing to methods for dealing with these problems or alternative approaches that might be more suitable. Note that in terms of scope, we ignore the wider use of SDMs to make inferences about ecological relationships only because this broader application is tangential to the particular focus of this volume. To provide a context for these objectives we begin in sections 6.1 and 6.2 by outlining what SDMs are, their ecological bases, what they are commonly used for, and the benefits they offer for spatial prioritization. In Section 6.3 we then outline the broad classes of models, and provide a commentary on their relative utility so that a newcomer can understand how to choose a method and set of analyses appropriate for their particular data and prioritization problem. Details on evaluation and on methodological steps and problems in building SDMs are treated in Sections 6.4 and 6.5. We then provide an illustrative example of fitting and evaluating SDMs in Section 6.6. Finally, Section 6.7 includes brief comment on limitations and future directions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J.
Venue
Spatial Conservation Prioritization
Published
2009-05-28
Pages
70-93
Cited by
73
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review