Cited by 86Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Maximizing species conservation in continental E cuador: a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions

Open access
Lessmann, Janeth, Muñoz, Jesús, Bonaccorso, Elisa·2014·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Ecuador has the largest number of species by area worldwide, but also a low representation of species within its protected areas. Here, we applied systematic conservation planning to identify potential areas for conservation in continental Ecuador, with the aim of increasing the representation of terrestrial species diversity in the protected area network. We selected 809 terrestrial species (amphibians, birds, mammals, and plants), for which distributions were estimated via species distribution models (SDMs), using Maxent. For each species we established conservation goals based on conservation priorities, and estimated new potential protected areas using Marxan conservation planning software. For each selected area, we determined their conservation priority and feasibility of establishment, two important aspects in the decision-making processes. We found that according to our conservation goals, the current protected area network contains large conservation gaps. Potential areas for conservation almost double the surface area of currently protected areas. Most of the newly proposed areas are located in the Coast, a region with large conservation gaps and irreversible changes in land use. The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions, which encompass more undisturbed habitats, and already harbor most of the current reserves. Our study allows defining a viable strategy for preserving Ecuador's biodiversity, by combining SDMs, GIS-based decision-support software, and priority and feasibility assessments of the selected areas. This approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study applies systematic conservation planning to continental Ecuador using species distribution models and Marxan to identify new protected areas that better represent 809 terrestrial species. It finds large gaps in the current PANE network and proposes potential conservation areas that would roughly double protected extent, with priority and feasibility varying strongly by region.

Key findings

  • The current protected area network achieved conservation goals for 309 of 809 species (38.2%); 500 species (61.8%) missed goals, including 4 species (0.5%) entirely outside PANE and 496 species (61.3%) insufficiently protected. Among endangered species (CR, EN, VU), only 26.9% achieved their goals.
  • Protection gaps were greatest on the Coast: only 17.3% of Coast species achieved goals, versus 41.8% in the Andes and 40.3% in the Amazon. PANE covered 16.3% of continental Ecuador overall, with 5.1% of the Coast, 20.6% of the Andes, and 23.2% of the Amazon protected.
  • Marxan selected 57 potential conservation areas (PACs) covering 49,843 km² (20.1% of continental Ecuador); combined with PANE, this would protect 90,375 km² (36.4%), roughly doubling the current network. The best solution met goals for 802 species, with only seven species showing 7–12% goal deficits.
  • Of the 57 PACs, 17 were maximum priority (14 in the Coast, 3 in the Andes); feasibility was maximum for 23 areas, high for 8, medium for 12, and low for 14. Most high-priority areas had low feasibility, while high-feasibility areas tended to have medium priority.

Methods

  • The planning exercise covered continental Ecuador (248,313 km², 96.62% of the country’s landmass), divided into Coast, Andes, and Amazon regions.
  • The authors selected 809 terrestrial species (182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, 506 plants), modeled distributions with Maxent using 19 Worldclim bioclimatic variables at ~1 km² resolution, and set species conservation goals between 15% and 30% based on extinction risk, taxonomic uniqueness, geographic extension, and home range.
  • Marxan was run with 50,507 hexagon planning units of 5 km², forcing existing PANE units into all solutions and excluding units with impact values >65 or fully transformed vegetation; analyses used 108 iterations and 100 runs, then assessed each selected area’s conservation priority and feasibility.

Limitations

  • Stated: SDMs may generate false species presences, potentially leading to nonrepresentative reserve networks; persistence criteria such as population dynamics or climate-change-related shifts were not considered; and economic costs were absent, with the authors noting that detailed acquisition, management, and opportunity cost maps are needed for future work.
  • Stated: conservation goals above 30% were avoided because preliminary analyses indicated they would require conservation areas exceeding a viable size for Ecuador’s economic and environmental reality.
  • Evident from the text: priority and feasibility are coarse categorical assessments based on two variables each, and the proposed network depends on decision-makers managing socio-economic conflicts and stakeholder interests not modeled in the analysis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.1102

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Verify all 4 references — free account
  • Findingreasoning

    Despite having high conservation priority, many areas in the Coast present low and medium feasibility.

    “However, despite having high conservation priority, many areas in the Coast present low and medium feasibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador.

    “The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador and may well be a priority to achieve the goal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the best Marxan solution, conservation goals were reached for 802 species.

    “In this solution, Marxan reached the conservation goals for 802 species; only seven showed low (7–12%) conservation goal deficits, because most of their distributions fall into highly transformed lands, previously excluded from the solution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The highest priority areas were located mainly in the Coast.

    “The highest priority areas were located mainly in the Coast, where the transformation and degradation of natural ecosystems have been the fastest in Ecuador (Sierra et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The study identified 12 areas in the southern Andes (Fig. 4: 36-47).

    “Finally, our study identified 12 areas in the southern Andes (Fig. 4: 36–47), which would level the current bias toward the northern Andes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 31
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Species of the Coast are the least protected; only 17.3% achieved their conservation goals, compared with 41.8% in the Andes and 40.3% in the Amazon.

    “Species of the Coast are the least protected; only 17.3% achieved their conservation goals, compared with 41.8% and 40.3% of the species in the Andes and Amazon, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    The western Andes are under higher threat and harbor less protected areas than the eastern Andes.

    “Specifically, the western Andes are under higher threat and harbor less protected areas than the eastern Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The 57 potential conservation areas constitute extensions of current protected areas, biological corridors among existing areas, or entirely new areas.

    “These 57 areas constitute extensions of current protected areas, biological corridors among currently existing areas, or entirely new areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Of the least feasible areas, 11 are in the Coast and three in the Andes.

    “Of the least feasible areas, 11 are in the Coast and three in the Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The Coast has only 5.1% of its territory protected by PANE, compared with 20.6% for the Andes and 23.2% for the Amazon.

    “The Coast has only 5.1% of its territory protected by PANE, compared with 20.6% for the Andes and 23.2% for the Amazon (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The Andes is the region where more species reached their conservation goals and thus the region with the lowest proposed increase in protected areas.

    “The Andes is the region where more species reached their conservation goals and, thus, the region with the lowest proposed increase in protected areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Three PACs were selected in the Tumbesian region (Fig. 4: 21-23), all adjacent to three protected areas in Peru.

    “Here, three PACs were selected (Fig. 4: 21–23), all adjacent to three protected areas in Peru (Cerros de Amopote National Park, Tumbes Wildlife Refuge, and El Angolo Hunting Reserve).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In terms of feasibility, 23 areas have maximum feasibility of establishment, eight have high feasibility, 12 have medium feasibility, and 14 have low feasibility.

    “In terms of feasibility, 23 areas have maximum feasibility of establishment, eight have high feasibility, 12 have medium feasibility, and 14 have low feasibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The Amazon and Andes regions encompass more undisturbed habitats and already harbor most of the current reserves.

    “The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions, which encompass more undisturbed habitats, and already harbor most of the current reserves.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Most areas with high priority have low feasibility, while areas with high feasibility have medium priority.

    “Most areas with high priority have low feasibility, while areas with high feasibility have medium priority.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In the central Amazon (southern Napo and western Pastaza provinces), both high diversity and lack of protection were observed.

    “In the central Amazon (southern Napo and western Pastaza provinces), we observed both high diversity and lack of protection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Potential areas for conservation and current protected areas cover 90,375 km2, which represents 36.4% of the continental territory of Ecuador.

    “Potential areas for conservation and current protected areas cover 90,375 km2, which represents 36.4% of the continental territory of Ecuador.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Of the remaining areas, one is classified as high priority, 32 as medium priority, and seven as low priority.

    “Of the remaining areas, one is classified as high priority, 32 as medium priority, and seven as low priority.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Almost all species have part of their distribution within reserves, but most have a low proportion of that distribution protected.

    “Almost all species have part of their distribution within reserves, but most of them have a low proportion of that distribution protected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Thirteen of the most feasible areas are located in the Andes, seven in the Amazon, and three in the Coast.

    “Thirteen of the most feasible areas are located in the Andes, seven in the Amazon, and three in the Coast.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    From the total of 57 PACs, 17 were identified as maximum conservation priority; 14 of these are in the Coast and three in the Andes.

    “From the total of 57 PACs, we identified 17 of maximum conservation priority; 14 of them located in the Coast and three in the Andes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Protected areas of the Amazon are located mostly in the north, leaving significant gaps in the south.

    “As it happens in the Andes region, protected areas of the Amazon are located mostly in the north, leaving significant gaps in the south.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    The observed diversity pattern agrees with previous studies at the continental scale that included Ecuador.

    “This pattern agrees with previous studies at the continental scale that included Ecuador (Myers et al. 2000; Bass et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Myers et al. 2000 source
    • cites Bass et al. 2010 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Moorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals mainly because they are distributed across the Andes, the richest region in reserves.

    “Only species of moorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals, mainly because they are distributed across the Andes, the richest region in reserves.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Protecting the corridor between the northern and central sections in which Los Ilinizas Ecological Reserve is divided (Fig. 4: 26), which represents 0.2% of the Ecuadorian territory, would be a good start, as it presented high priority and feasibility of conservation.

    “Based on our analysis of feasibility and priority, protecting the corridor between the northern and central sections in which Los Ilinizas Ecological Reserve is divided (Fig. 4: 26), which represents 0.2% of the Ecuadorian territory, would be a good start, as it presented high priority and feasibility of conservation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Several potential conservation areas are needed to complete the defined goals and create corridors increasing conservation efficiency of the current network.

    “However, our results suggest that several potential conservation areas are needed to complete the defined goals and create corridors increasing conservation efficiency of the current network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast may well be a priority to achieve the goal.

    “The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador and may well be a priority to achieve the goal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Marxan identifies a set of planning units that meets predefined species conservation goals while minimizing the total cost of the solution.

    “In each of multiple iterations, Marxan identifies a set of planning units (PUs) that meets predefined species conservation goals while minimizing the “total cost” of the solution (Ardron et al. 2008; Game and Grantham 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ardron et al. 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Game and Grantham 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Formal recognition of these areas in Ecuador may promote binational efforts for conservation of the unique Tumbesian avifauna.

    “Formal recognition of these areas in Ecuador may promote binational efforts for conservation of the unique Tumbesian avifauna.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    PACs in the coastline (Fig. 4: 14) compose a geographic unit that plays a crucial role in climate regulation and are considered of special interest for species protection, especially birds.

    “Similarly, PACs in the coastline (Fig. 4: 14) compose a geographic unit that plays a crucial role in climate regulation in the region and are considered of special interest for species protection, especially birds (BirdLife International 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BirdLife International 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    All these areas require a high economic investment for restoration, but they would preserve highly endangered biodiversity.

    “All these areas require a high economic investment for restoration, but they would preserve highly endangered biodiversity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Combining species- and ecosystem-based studies would improve the decision makers solution portfolio, avoiding biases and allowing better-informed decisions.

    “Combining species- and ecosystem-based studies would improve the decision makers solution portfolio, avoiding biases and allowing better-informed decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The best solution is the run with the lowest total cost and therefore the most efficient of the 100 runs.

    “The best solution is the run with the lowest total cost and therefore the most efficient of the 100 runs (Game and Grantham 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Game and Grantham 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Habitat-degraded lands within potential conservation areas in the central Coast (such as 9-19 in Fig. 4) are good options for restoration programs.

    “Thus, habitat-degraded lands within potential conservation areas in the central Coast (such as 9–19 in Fig. 4) are good options for restoration programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Studies focused on ecosystems found that protected areas already existing in the north represent Amazon ecosystems adequately.

    “For example, studies focused on ecosystems found that protected areas already existing in the north represent Amazon ecosystems adequately (Sierra et al. 2002; Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sierra et al. 2002 source
    • cites Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The low importance may derive from the fact that a large number of PUs in the Amazon are equally important to achieve the proposed conservation goals, and thus virtually interchangeable.

    “The low importance may derive from the fact that a large number of PUs in the Amazon are equally important to achieve the proposed conservation goals, and thus virtually interchangeable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Government's goal is to increase the protected area to encompass an additional 5% of the Ecuadorian territory.

    “Regarding the Government's goal of increasing the protected area to encompass an additional 5% of the Ecuadorian territory [20], it is clear that our results largely exceed the established increase.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Chocó bioregion contains a high richness of target species and has been classified as a biodiversity hotspot because of its great diversity and high vulnerability.

    “This bioregion contains a high richness of target species and has been classified as a biodiversity hotspot because of its great diversity and high vulnerability (Myers et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Myers et al. 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is necessary to propose a significant increase in the reserve system to meet the unachieved conservation goals.

    “Large conservation gaps found in the current protected area network indicate that it is necessary to propose a significant increase in the reserve system to meet the unachieved conservation goals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    More conservation efforts are needed in the northern Amazon, to protect irreplaceable areas around Cuyabeno and Yasuní (Fig. 4: 49-52).

    “Consequently, our results suggest that more conservation efforts are needed in the northern Amazon, to protect irreplaceable areas around Cuyabeno and Yasuní (Fig. 4: 49–52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Historically, the Coast has supported much of the country's agriculture and has suffered from significant urban development.

    “Historically, this region has supported much of the country's agriculture and has suffered from significant urban development (Sierra et al. 1999; Sáenz and Onofa 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sierra et al. 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sáenz and Onofa 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This situation results from the combination of high habitat degradation, small extension of protected forests, and few protected areas, reducing the chances of selecting areas with high feasibility in this region.

    “This situation results from the combination of high habitat degradation, small extension of protected forests, and few protected areas, reducing the chances of selecting areas with high feasibility in this region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.

    “This approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: PANE reserves are more likely to persist over time than other protected areas.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationown data

    It is more realistic to present an assessment of conservation priority and feasibility for the proposed areas, which may guide and support decision making.

    “Therefore, it is more realistic to present an assessment of conservation priority and feasibility for the proposed areas, which may guide and support decision making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The summed solution provides the frequency in which each planning unit is selected across the 100 runs and indicates how important a planning unit is for creating an efficient reserve system.

    “The summed solution provides the frequency in which each PU is selected across the 100 runs and therefore indicates how important a PU is for creating an efficient reserve system (Ardron et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ardron et al. 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Informed measures will improve the effectiveness of reserve networks and, ultimately, will contribute to better protection for biodiversity, in contrast with an impromptu selection of sites.

    “Informed measures will improve the effectiveness of reserve networks and, ultimately, will contribute to better protection for biodiversity, in contrast with an impromptu selection of sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Private initiatives may assume the costs of establishing new conservation areas.

    “However, private initiatives may assume the costs of establishing new conservation areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    The task ahead involves improving data availability and the limitations inherent to conservation planning, in order to enable us to act strategically in the face of increasing human pressure.

    “Clearly, the task ahead involves improving data availability and the limitations inherent to conservation planning, in order to enable us to act strategically in the face of increasing human pressure (Rodrigues et al. 2004a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodrigues et al. 2004a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The conservation of areas with only a small proportion of their extension within protected forest or buffer zones may be considered of high urgency, because although seemingly of low feasibility, they are important for complementing representativeness and are currently out of the protected area network.

    “The conservation of areas with only a small proportion of their extension within protected forest or buffer zones may be also considered of high urgency, because although seemingly of low feasibility, they are important for complementing representativeness and are currently out of the protected area network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    It is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources.

    “It is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources (Naidoo et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naidoo et al. 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    These and other limitations are likely to be minor compared with the urgency of taking informed conservation measures to slow the ongoing loss of biodiversity in tropical countries.

    “However, these and other limitations are likely to be minor compared with the urgency of taking informed conservation measures to slow the ongoing loss of biodiversity in tropical countries (Groves et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Groves et al. 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our reserve design shows some limitations inherent to the tools used.

    “Our reserve design shows some limitations inherent to the tools used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In this context, it seems difficult to promote the establishment of new protected areas.

    “Therefore, in this context, it seems difficult to promote the establishment of new protected areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and on the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests.

    “We are aware that the establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and in the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests (Margules and Pressey 2000; Dudley and Parish 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Margules and Pressey 2000 source
    • cites Dudley and Parish 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The absence of persistence criteria for selecting potential conservation areas (i.e., population dynamics or climate change related shifts) was not considered here, as they were beyond the scope of this study.

    “Also, the absence of persistence criteria for selecting potential conservation areas (i.e., population dynamics or climate change related shifts) was not considered here, as they were beyond the scope of this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Private reserves have proved to be viable options for conservation in Ecuador and currently cover 4.6% of the country.

    “In fact, private reserves have proved to be viable options for conservation in Ecuador and currently cover 4.6% of the country (Castaño-Uribe 2008; Elbers 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Castaño-Uribe 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Elbers 2011
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PANE reserves are more likely to persist over time than other protected areas.

    “Herein, we looked for potential conservation areas that complement the biodiversity preserved only by PANE, as these reserves are more likely to persist over time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.

    “To select the conservation targets, we focus on the best-studied species groups in Ecuador, which correspond to birds, amphibians, mammals, and vascular plants.”
    “Specifically, we selected 809 terrestrial species: 182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, and 506 plants that had enough occurrence records in Ecuador to generate reliable SDMs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Coast region has irreversible changes in land use.

    “Most of the newly proposed areas are located in the Coast, a region with large conservation gaps and irreversible changes in land use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ecuador faces significant challenges to define new protected areas because of its great biodiversity, scarce biological information, and limited resources for conservation.

    “Ecuador, as many other tropical countries, faces significant challenges to define new protected areas because of its great biodiversity, scarce biological information, and limited resources for conservation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.

    “Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Proposed areas are not more than twice the existing protected area

    Minor

    Table 2 lists 49,843 km2 of PACs and 40,532 km2 protected by PANE. The proposed areas are about 1.23 times the existing protected area, not more than twice it.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Castaño‐Uribe C., 2008, Diagnóstico y situación actual de las áreas protegidas en América Latina y el Caribe, Informe Regional
  2. Cuesta‐Camacho F., 2006, Identificación de vacíos y prioridades de conservación para la biodiversidad terrestre en el Ecuador continental
  3. ECOLAP & Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, 2007, Guía del Patrimonio de Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Ecuador
  4. Fonseca R. M., 2003, Identificación preliminar de un corredor ecológico para mamíferos entre los Paques Nacionales Llanganates y Sangay, Revista de la Pontificia Universidad Católica, 71, 201
  5. Galindo J., 2005, Análisis de necesidad de financiamiento del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (SNAP) del Ecuador
  6. Game E. T., 2008, Marxan user manual: for marxan version 1.8.10
  7. McPherson M., 2008, GIS‐based modeling of Environmental Risk Surfaces (ERS) for conservation planning in Jamaica, J. Conserv. Plann., 4, 60
  8. Sáenz M., 2005, Reporte de los ecosistemas terrestres ecuatoriano. Indicadores de biodiversidad para su uso nacional

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lessmann, J., Muñoz, J., & Bonaccorso, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Indoamérica (EC)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Lessmann, Janeth
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-17
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
2410-2422
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082880167
Cited by
80
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (CGL2012-38624-C02-02)
  • Universidad Tecnol�gica Indoam�rica (Convocatoria 2011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
systematic conservation planning, protected area network, conservation gaps, species distribution modeling, conservation prioritization, feasibility assessment, Marxan, MaxEnt, biodiversity conservation, Ecuador, Amazon, Andes, coastal areas, land use change, decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review