The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Maximizing species conservation in continental E cuador: a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions
Open accessAbstract
Ecuador has the largest number of species by area worldwide, but also a low representation of species within its protected areas. Here, we applied systematic conservation planning to identify potential areas for conservation in continental Ecuador, with the aim of increasing the representation of terrestrial species diversity in the protected area network. We selected 809 terrestrial species (amphibians, birds, mammals, and plants), for which distributions were estimated via species distribution models (SDMs), using Maxent. For each species we established conservation goals based on conservation priorities, and estimated new potential protected areas using Marxan conservation planning software. For each selected area, we determined their conservation priority and feasibility of establishment, two important aspects in the decision-making processes. We found that according to our conservation goals, the current protected area network contains large conservation gaps. Potential areas for conservation almost double the surface area of currently protected areas. Most of the newly proposed areas are located in the Coast, a region with large conservation gaps and irreversible changes in land use. The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions, which encompass more undisturbed habitats, and already harbor most of the current reserves. Our study allows defining a viable strategy for preserving Ecuador's biodiversity, by combining SDMs, GIS-based decision-support software, and priority and feasibility assessments of the selected areas. This approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study applies systematic conservation planning to continental Ecuador using species distribution models and Marxan to identify new protected areas that better represent 809 terrestrial species. It finds large gaps in the current PANE network and proposes potential conservation areas that would roughly double protected extent, with priority and feasibility varying strongly by region.
Key findings
- The current protected area network achieved conservation goals for 309 of 809 species (38.2%); 500 species (61.8%) missed goals, including 4 species (0.5%) entirely outside PANE and 496 species (61.3%) insufficiently protected. Among endangered species (CR, EN, VU), only 26.9% achieved their goals.
- Protection gaps were greatest on the Coast: only 17.3% of Coast species achieved goals, versus 41.8% in the Andes and 40.3% in the Amazon. PANE covered 16.3% of continental Ecuador overall, with 5.1% of the Coast, 20.6% of the Andes, and 23.2% of the Amazon protected.
- Marxan selected 57 potential conservation areas (PACs) covering 49,843 km² (20.1% of continental Ecuador); combined with PANE, this would protect 90,375 km² (36.4%), roughly doubling the current network. The best solution met goals for 802 species, with only seven species showing 7–12% goal deficits.
- Of the 57 PACs, 17 were maximum priority (14 in the Coast, 3 in the Andes); feasibility was maximum for 23 areas, high for 8, medium for 12, and low for 14. Most high-priority areas had low feasibility, while high-feasibility areas tended to have medium priority.
Methods
- The planning exercise covered continental Ecuador (248,313 km², 96.62% of the country’s landmass), divided into Coast, Andes, and Amazon regions.
- The authors selected 809 terrestrial species (182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, 506 plants), modeled distributions with Maxent using 19 Worldclim bioclimatic variables at ~1 km² resolution, and set species conservation goals between 15% and 30% based on extinction risk, taxonomic uniqueness, geographic extension, and home range.
- Marxan was run with 50,507 hexagon planning units of 5 km², forcing existing PANE units into all solutions and excluding units with impact values >65 or fully transformed vegetation; analyses used 108 iterations and 100 runs, then assessed each selected area’s conservation priority and feasibility.
Limitations
- Stated: SDMs may generate false species presences, potentially leading to nonrepresentative reserve networks; persistence criteria such as population dynamics or climate-change-related shifts were not considered; and economic costs were absent, with the authors noting that detailed acquisition, management, and opportunity cost maps are needed for future work.
- Stated: conservation goals above 30% were avoided because preliminary analyses indicated they would require conservation areas exceeding a viable size for Ecuador’s economic and environmental reality.
- Evident from the text: priority and feasibility are coarse categorical assessments based on two variables each, and the proposed network depends on decision-makers managing socio-economic conflicts and stakeholder interests not modeled in the analysis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
Despite having high conservation priority, many areas in the Coast present low and medium feasibility.
“However, despite having high conservation priority, many areas in the Coast present low and medium feasibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador.
“The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador and may well be a priority to achieve the goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the best Marxan solution, conservation goals were reached for 802 species.
“In this solution, Marxan reached the conservation goals for 802 species; only seven showed low (7–12%) conservation goal deficits, because most of their distributions fall into highly transformed lands, previously excluded from the solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The highest priority areas were located mainly in the Coast.
“The highest priority areas were located mainly in the Coast, where the transformation and degradation of natural ecosystems have been the fastest in Ecuador (Sierra et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 12 areas in the southern Andes (Fig. 4: 36-47).
“Finally, our study identified 12 areas in the southern Andes (Fig. 4: 36–47), which would level the current bias toward the northern Andes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
In the eastern Andes, the proposed areas (Fig. 4: 27-30, 32) comprise several corridors that connect five mostly northern protected areas.
“In the eastern Andes, the proposed areas (Fig. 4: 27–30, 32) comprise several corridors that connect five, mostly northern protected areas: El Angel Ecological Reserve, Cayambe Coca National Park, Sumaco Napo Galeras National Park, Antisana National Park, and Cotopaxi Ecological Reserve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Based on the ensemble of 809 species distribution models, the highest diversity for all species is located in the northern Amazon and the northern coast of Ecuador or Ecuadorian Chocó.
“Based on the ensemble of 809 SDMs, the highest diversity for all species is located in the northern Amazon and the northern coast of Ecuador or Ecuadorian Chocó (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The current protected area network of continental Ecuador showed large conservation gaps for the species analyzed.
“The current protected area network of continental Ecuador showed large conservation gaps for the species analyzed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A large proportion of areas of great diversity (Chocó region and part of northern Amazon) lack formal protection.
“A large proportion of areas of great diversity (Chocó region and part of northern Amazon) lack formal protection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The southeastern Coast (Tumbesian region) has a high richness of bird species.
“The southeastern Coast (Tumbesian region), where we identified a high richness of bird species, is considered an important bird area (BirdLife International 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
16.3% of the terrestrial areas in continental Ecuador are protected by PANE.
“Similar to the study by Cuesta-Camacho et al. (2006), we found that 16.3% of the terrestrial areas in continental Ecuador are protected by PANE (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
According to the species conservation goals, the great majority of species (61.8%) are insufficiently protected.
“According to the species conservation goals, the great majority of species (61.8%) are insufficiently protected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among endangered species (CR, EN, VU), only 26.9% achieved their conservation goals.
“Among the endangered species (CR, EN, VU), only 26.9% achieved their conservation goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 500 species whose conservation goals were missed, 4 (0.5%) are completely outside PANE.
“Of the remaining 500 species (61.8%), 4 (0.5%) are completely out of the PANE and 496 (61.3%) are insufficiently protected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The PACs in the Amazon were mostly considered of medium and low priority, because of the combination of low environmental impact and low importance.
“In contrast to the Coast and the Andes, the PACs in the Amazon were mostly considered of medium and low priority, because of the combination of low environmental impact and low importance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Small patches of natural vegetation still remain in the heavily altered central Coast zone.
“However, small patches of natural vegetation still remain in this heavily altered zone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Most of the endangered species (∼75%) were insufficiently represented by the current protected area network.
“Most of the endangered species (∼75%) were insufficiently represented by the current protected area network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our results largely exceed the established increase of the Government's goal.
“Regarding the Government's goal of increasing the protected area to encompass an additional 5% of the Ecuadorian territory [20], it is clear that our results largely exceed the established increase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The southern and eastern foothills of the Amazon are poorly represented in current protected areas.
“Also, as the southern and the eastern foothills of the Amazon are poorly represented in current protected areas, Marxan proposed new areas for protecting the southern Amazon (Fig. 4: 53–57).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Species conservation goals above 30% require conservation areas that exceed a viable size for the economic and environmental reality of Ecuador.
“This assignation was based on preliminary analyses, indicating that species conservation goals above 30% require conservation areas that exceed a viable size for the economic and environmental reality of Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In our work, the extension of PACs is more than twice the national protected area network.
“Indeed, in our work, the extension of PACs is more than twice the national protected area network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
From a species-based perspective, the high species richness in the northern Amazon is not adequately protected.
“However, from a species-based perspective, the high species richness in the northern Amazon is not adequately protected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the best Marxan solution, seven species showed low (7-12%) conservation goal deficits.
“In this solution, Marxan reached the conservation goals for 802 species; only seven showed low (7–12%) conservation goal deficits, because most of their distributions fall into highly transformed lands, previously excluded from the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the Andes, the highest priority areas are located near urban centers and adjacent to zones transformed by agriculture and cattle farming.
“In the Andes, the highest priority areas are located near urban centers and adjacent to zones transformed by agriculture and cattle farming.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only mammals, bromeliads, and moorland plants have more than 50% of their species with conservation goals achieved.
“Only mammals, bromeliads, and moorland plants have more than 50% of their species with conservation goals achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Planning units selected in the best solution were grouped within 57 potential conservation areas (PACs).
“Planning units selected in the best solution were grouped within 57 PACs (Fig. 4), of which the highest proportion is located in the Coast (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 500 species whose conservation goals were missed, 496 (61.3%) are insufficiently protected.
“Of the remaining 500 species (61.8%), 4 (0.5%) are completely out of the PANE and 496 (61.3%) are insufficiently protected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The current protected area network achieved the defined conservation goals for 309 species (38.2%).
“The current protected area network achieved the defined conservation goals for 309 species (38.2%, Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Current protected areas have lower average environmental impact (22.72 ± 29.69) than areas outside protected areas (50.93 ± 41).
“On average, current protected areas recorded environmental impacts of 22.72 (± 29.69). These values are low when compared to the impact records of 50.93 (± 41) outside protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Only species of moorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals.
“Only species of moorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals, mainly because they are distributed across the Andes, the richest region in reserves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In contrast, the Andean region showed the smallest conservation gaps.
“In contrast, the Andean region showed the smallest conservation gaps, which resulted from the high concentration of large protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Considering the three regions of continental Ecuador, the Coast showed the largest conservation gaps.
“Considering the three regions of continental Ecuador, the Coast showed the largest conservation gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The territories included in the current protected area network showed lower values of environmental impact compared with the rest of Ecuador.
“Despite the conservation gaps found for target species, the territories included in the current protected area network showed lower values of environmental impact compared with the rest of Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified eight potential reserves for the northern Coast, encompassing the southern portion of the Chocó (Fig. 4: 1-8).
“Our study identified eight potential reserves for the northern Coast, encompassing the southern portion of the Chocó (Fig. 4: 1–8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Marxan proposed new areas for protecting the southern Amazon (Fig. 4: 53-57).
“Also, as the southern and the eastern foothills of the Amazon are poorly represented in current protected areas, Marxan proposed new areas for protecting the southern Amazon (Fig. 4: 53–57).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
13 of the 16 Andean reserves are located in the northern Andes.
“However, 13 of the 16 Andean reserves are located in the northern Andes, which may result in conservation gaps for species and ecosystems with southern distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions.
“The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions, which encompass more undisturbed habitats, and already harbor most of the current reserves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Marxan proposed corridors and extensions for the large protected areas Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve, Yasuní National Park, and Sumaco Napo Galeras National Park (Fig. 4: 48, 49, 50 and 52).
“In the Amazon region, Marxan proposed corridors and extensions for the large protected areas Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve, Yasuní National Park, and Sumaco Napo Galeras National Park (Fig. 4: 48, 49, 50 and 52).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most newly proposed potential conservation areas are located in the Coast.
“Most of the newly proposed areas are located in the Coast, a region with large conservation gaps and irreversible changes in land use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
New areas with low protection in the Amazon (Fig. 4: 52-54), the Andes (Fig. 4: 35, 38, 40-42, 44), the southern (Fig. 4: 22 and 23), central (Fig. 4: 10, 13, 15-17) and northern (Fig. 4: 4-7) Coast summed compose 5.4% of Ecuador.
“From this point of view, we highlight new areas with low protection in the Amazon (Fig. 4: 52–54), the Andes (Fig. 4: 35, 38, 40–42, 44), the southern (Fig. 4: 22 and 23), central (Fig. 4: 10, 13, 15–17) and northern (Fig. 4: 4–7) Coast, which summed compose 5.4% of Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Remnants of pristine land, characterized by low environmental impact and land transformation, in the Andes (Fig. 4: 30, 41 and 43) and the Amazon (Fig. 4: 49, 52, 53, 55-57) jointly represent 5.1% of Ecuador.
“Further options to reach the goals established by the Ecuadorian Government are the remnants of pristine land, characterized by low environmental impact and land transformation, in the Andes (Fig. 4: 30, 41 and 43) and the Amazon (Fig. 4: 49, 52, 53, 55–57), jointly representing 5.1% of Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The results agree with two previous ecosystem-based studies where the Coast is considered the region in most need of protection.
“Conversely, our results agree with two previous ecosystem-based studies (Sierra et al. 2002; Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006) where the Coast is considered the region in most need of protection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 2002 source
- cites Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Large conservation gaps in the Coast resulted in a major concentration of proposed areas along this region.
“Large conservation gaps in the Coast resulted in a major concentration of proposed areas along this region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The 12 identified areas in the southern Andes would level the current bias toward the northern Andes.
“Finally, our study identified 12 areas in the southern Andes (Fig. 4: 36–47), which would level the current bias toward the northern Andes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The results highlight the importance of Amazon areas for biodiversity conservation.
“Regardless of the difficulty of implementing protected areas within oil blocks, our results highlight the importance of Amazon areas for biodiversity conservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This situation has been an obstacle for the establishment of protected areas, especially in the central Coast, which is characterized by large spans of transformed land.
“This situation has been an obstacle for the establishment of protected areas, especially in the central Coast, which is characterized by large spans of transformed land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study allows defining a viable strategy for preserving Ecuador's biodiversity by combining species distribution models, GIS-based decision-support software, and priority and feasibility assessments of the selected areas.
“Our study allows defining a viable strategy for preserving Ecuador's biodiversity, by combining SDMs, GIS-based decision-support software, and priority and feasibility assessments of the selected areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: PANE reserves are more likely to persist over time than other protected areas.
- Rests on an assumption: The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.
- Interpretationcitation
Results using ecosystems as conservation targets may differ from studies using species.
“Results using ecosystems as conservation targets may differ from the studies using species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Existing protected areas are playing an important role in preventing environmental degradation across Ecuador.
“Thus, it may be concluded that existing protected areas are indeed playing an important role in preventing environmental degradation across Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Tumbesian region is considered an important bird area.
“The southeastern Coast (Tumbesian region), where we identified a high richness of bird species, is considered an important bird area (BirdLife International 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BirdLife International 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The implementation of the PACs identified for the Coast may require significantly high acquisition costs, because of foregone opportunities to use the land in economically valuable ways.
“Therefore, the implementation of the PACs identified for this region may require significantly high acquisition costs, because of foregone opportunities to use the land in economically valuable ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The transformation and degradation of natural ecosystems have been the fastest in Ecuador in the Coast.
“The highest priority areas were located mainly in the Coast, where the transformation and degradation of natural ecosystems have been the fastest in Ecuador (Sierra et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Amazon biodiversity suffers from high vulnerability because over 65% of the territory is divided into blocks for oil exploitation.
“However, despite the low priority and high feasibility of the Amazon areas, its biodiversity suffers from high vulnerability because over 65% of the territory is divided into blocks for oil exploitation (Finer et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Finer et al. 2008 source
- Interpretationcitation
The central southern corridor between Sangay National Park and Llanganates National Park (Fig. 4: 33) might be important for the conservation of large-sized mammals and birds.
“There is also a central southern corridor between the Sangay National Park and Llanganates National Park (Fig. 4: 33), which might be important for the conservation of large-sized mammals and birds (Fonseca et al. 2003; BirdLife International 2012a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fonseca et al. 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites BirdLife International 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The location of 13 of 16 Andean reserves in the northern Andes may result in conservation gaps for species and ecosystems with southern distributions.
“However, 13 of the 16 Andean reserves are located in the northern Andes, which may result in conservation gaps for species and ecosystems with southern distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The current protected area network in continental Ecuador contains large conservation gaps for species.
“We found that according to our conservation goals, the current protected area network contains large conservation gaps.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Unfortunately, this protected area network shows large conservation gaps for species and ecosystems (Sierra et al. 2002; Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006).”
- Also stated in: § Achievement of species conservation goals by the current protected area network · hedged
“Large conservation gaps found in the current protected area network indicate that it is necessary to propose a significant increase in the reserve system to meet the unachieved conservation goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 2002 source
- cites Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Ecuador has the largest number of species by area worldwide.
“Ecuador has the largest number of species by area worldwide”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Ecuador, one of the 17 megadiverse countries, and the most biodiverse when considering species number by unit area (Sierra et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 2002 source
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Over 65% of the Amazon territory is divided into blocks for oil exploitation.
“However, despite the low priority and high feasibility of the Amazon areas, its biodiversity suffers from high vulnerability because over 65% of the territory is divided into blocks for oil exploitation (Finer et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Finer et al. 2008 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The Andean region's smallest conservation gaps resulted from the high concentration of large protected areas.
“In contrast, the Andean region showed the smallest conservation gaps, which resulted from the high concentration of large protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Implementing the proposed network would double the extent of the current protected area system from 16.3% to 36.4% of continental Ecuador.
“Potential areas for conservation almost double the surface area of currently protected areas.”
- Also stated in: § Identifying potential areas for conservation · hedged
“Therefore, implementing this proposed network would imply doubling the extent of the current system of protected areas (from 16.3% to 36.4% of continental Ecuador).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Identifying potential areas for conservation · hedged
- Premisecitation
The main conservation challenge is the central Coast, which has experienced extensive transformation of the original ecosystems by intensive agriculture.
“The main conservation challenge is the central Coast, which has experienced extensive transformation of the original ecosystems by intensive agriculture (Sáenz and Onofa 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sáenz and Onofa 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The study selected 809 terrestrial species (182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, and 506 plants) that had enough occurrence records in Ecuador to generate reliable species distribution models.
“Specifically, we selected 809 terrestrial species: 182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, and 506 plants that had enough occurrence records in Ecuador to generate reliable SDMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.
- Premisecitation
The opportunity costs of farming and grazing on the Coast are the highest in Ecuador.
“In addition, the opportunity costs of farming and grazing on the Coast are the highest in Ecuador (Naidoo and Iwamura 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naidoo and Iwamura 2007 source
- Interpretationown data
The seven species' conservation goal deficits occurred because most of their distributions fall into highly transformed lands previously excluded from the solution.
“In this solution, Marxan reached the conservation goals for 802 species; only seven showed low (7–12%) conservation goal deficits, because most of their distributions fall into highly transformed lands, previously excluded from the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The corridors between the Cotacachi Cayapas Ecological Reserve, Pululahua Geobotanical Reserve, and Los Illinizas Ecological Reserve (Fig. 4: 24-26) are especially relevant.
“Consequently, the corridors between the Cotacachi Cayapas Ecological Reserve, Pululahua Geobotanical Reserve, and Los Illinizas Ecological Reserve (Fig. 4: 24–26) are especially relevant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Species distribution models were used as an intermediate step to estimate geographic distributions because complete information about target species distributions was lacking.
“Given the lack of complete information about the distribution of target species, we used SDMs as an intermediate step toward estimating their geographic distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elith and Leathwick 2009b source
- Interpretationreasoning
Likely, restricted geographic ranges decrease the chance that species distributions overlap with protected areas.
“Likely, their restricted geographic ranges decrease the chance that their distributions overlap with protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Protecting areas of maximum feasibility and medium priority (mainly because of their low impact), which represent 3.4% of Ecuador, would complete the Government's goal of 5%.
“Finally, protecting areas of maximum feasibility and medium priority (mainly because of their low impact), which represent 3.4% of Ecuador, would complete the Government's goal of 5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite the absence of economic costs in our analysis, the priority areas that we identified are useful to guide the conservation planning in Ecuador given their efficiency in important aspects such as size, connectivity, low level of human intervention, species representativeness, and complementarity.
“It is important to note that despite the absence of economic costs in our analysis, the priority areas that we identified are useful to guide the conservation planning in Ecuador given their efficiency in important aspects such as size, connectivity, low level of human intervention, species representativeness, and complementarity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In some cases, SDMs may generate false species presences that would conduct to the design of nonrepresentative and inadequate reserve networks.
“For example, in some cases, SDMs may generate false species presences that would conduct to the design of nonrepresentative and inadequate reserve networks (Carvalho et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carvalho et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Other types of data available for highly diverse tropical areas, such as observed points or geographic ranges, usually produce more errors than SDMs.
“However, other types of data available for highly diverse tropical areas, such as observed points or geographic ranges, usually produce more errors than SDMs (Rondinini et al. 2005; Carvalho et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rondinini et al. 2005 source
- cites Carvalho et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Using this last criterion, no protected area would be added in the Coast, the region with greatest conservation gaps.
“However, using this last criterion, no protected area would be added in the Coast, the region with greatest conservation gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The current protected areas of Ecuador have several limitations regarding management, given budget deficits, and high pressure on land resource extraction.
“The current protected areas of Ecuador have several limitations regarding management, given budget deficits, and high pressure on land resource extraction (Galindo et al. 2005; Castaño-Uribe 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Galindo et al. 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Castaño-Uribe 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 27
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSpecies of the Coast are the least protected; only 17.3% achieved their conservation goals, compared with 41.8% in the Andes and 40.3% in the Amazon.
“Species of the Coast are the least protected; only 17.3% achieved their conservation goals, compared with 41.8% and 40.3% of the species in the Andes and Amazon, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe western Andes are under higher threat and harbor less protected areas than the eastern Andes.
“Specifically, the western Andes are under higher threat and harbor less protected areas than the eastern Andes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe 57 potential conservation areas constitute extensions of current protected areas, biological corridors among existing areas, or entirely new areas.
“These 57 areas constitute extensions of current protected areas, biological corridors among currently existing areas, or entirely new areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOf the least feasible areas, 11 are in the Coast and three in the Andes.
“Of the least feasible areas, 11 are in the Coast and three in the Andes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe Coast has only 5.1% of its territory protected by PANE, compared with 20.6% for the Andes and 23.2% for the Amazon.
“The Coast has only 5.1% of its territory protected by PANE, compared with 20.6% for the Andes and 23.2% for the Amazon (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe Andes is the region where more species reached their conservation goals and thus the region with the lowest proposed increase in protected areas.
“The Andes is the region where more species reached their conservation goals and, thus, the region with the lowest proposed increase in protected areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThree PACs were selected in the Tumbesian region (Fig. 4: 21-23), all adjacent to three protected areas in Peru.
“Here, three PACs were selected (Fig. 4: 21–23), all adjacent to three protected areas in Peru (Cerros de Amopote National Park, Tumbes Wildlife Refuge, and El Angolo Hunting Reserve).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn terms of feasibility, 23 areas have maximum feasibility of establishment, eight have high feasibility, 12 have medium feasibility, and 14 have low feasibility.
“In terms of feasibility, 23 areas have maximum feasibility of establishment, eight have high feasibility, 12 have medium feasibility, and 14 have low feasibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe Amazon and Andes regions encompass more undisturbed habitats and already harbor most of the current reserves.
“The most feasible areas for conservation were found in the Amazon and Andes regions, which encompass more undisturbed habitats, and already harbor most of the current reserves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMost areas with high priority have low feasibility, while areas with high feasibility have medium priority.
“Most areas with high priority have low feasibility, while areas with high feasibility have medium priority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn the central Amazon (southern Napo and western Pastaza provinces), both high diversity and lack of protection were observed.
“In the central Amazon (southern Napo and western Pastaza provinces), we observed both high diversity and lack of protection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPotential areas for conservation and current protected areas cover 90,375 km2, which represents 36.4% of the continental territory of Ecuador.
“Potential areas for conservation and current protected areas cover 90,375 km2, which represents 36.4% of the continental territory of Ecuador.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOf the remaining areas, one is classified as high priority, 32 as medium priority, and seven as low priority.
“Of the remaining areas, one is classified as high priority, 32 as medium priority, and seven as low priority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAlmost all species have part of their distribution within reserves, but most have a low proportion of that distribution protected.
“Almost all species have part of their distribution within reserves, but most of them have a low proportion of that distribution protected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThirteen of the most feasible areas are located in the Andes, seven in the Amazon, and three in the Coast.
“Thirteen of the most feasible areas are located in the Andes, seven in the Amazon, and three in the Coast.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataFrom the total of 57 PACs, 17 were identified as maximum conservation priority; 14 of these are in the Coast and three in the Andes.
“From the total of 57 PACs, we identified 17 of maximum conservation priority; 14 of them located in the Coast and three in the Andes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataProtected areas of the Amazon are located mostly in the north, leaving significant gaps in the south.
“As it happens in the Andes region, protected areas of the Amazon are located mostly in the north, leaving significant gaps in the south.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationcitationThe observed diversity pattern agrees with previous studies at the continental scale that included Ecuador.
“This pattern agrees with previous studies at the continental scale that included Ecuador (Myers et al. 2000; Bass et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMoorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals mainly because they are distributed across the Andes, the richest region in reserves.
“Only species of moorland plants fully achieved their conservation goals, mainly because they are distributed across the Andes, the richest region in reserves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataProtecting the corridor between the northern and central sections in which Los Ilinizas Ecological Reserve is divided (Fig. 4: 26), which represents 0.2% of the Ecuadorian territory, would be a good start, as it presented high priority and feasibility of conservation.
“Based on our analysis of feasibility and priority, protecting the corridor between the northern and central sections in which Los Ilinizas Ecological Reserve is divided (Fig. 4: 26), which represents 0.2% of the Ecuadorian territory, would be a good start, as it presented high priority and feasibility of conservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataSeveral potential conservation areas are needed to complete the defined goals and create corridors increasing conservation efficiency of the current network.
“However, our results suggest that several potential conservation areas are needed to complete the defined goals and create corridors increasing conservation efficiency of the current network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast may well be a priority to achieve the goal.
“The areas of highest priority and medium feasibility located in the Coast (Fig. 4: 8, 12, 18, 19, and 21) represent 1.3% of Ecuador and may well be a priority to achieve the goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMarxan identifies a set of planning units that meets predefined species conservation goals while minimizing the total cost of the solution.
“In each of multiple iterations, Marxan identifies a set of planning units (PUs) that meets predefined species conservation goals while minimizing the “total cost” of the solution (Ardron et al. 2008; Game and Grantham 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ardron et al. 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Game and Grantham 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningFormal recognition of these areas in Ecuador may promote binational efforts for conservation of the unique Tumbesian avifauna.
“Formal recognition of these areas in Ecuador may promote binational efforts for conservation of the unique Tumbesian avifauna.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPACs in the coastline (Fig. 4: 14) compose a geographic unit that plays a crucial role in climate regulation and are considered of special interest for species protection, especially birds.
“Similarly, PACs in the coastline (Fig. 4: 14) compose a geographic unit that plays a crucial role in climate regulation in the region and are considered of special interest for species protection, especially birds (BirdLife International 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BirdLife International 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenAll these areas require a high economic investment for restoration, but they would preserve highly endangered biodiversity.
“All these areas require a high economic investment for restoration, but they would preserve highly endangered biodiversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningCombining species- and ecosystem-based studies would improve the decision makers solution portfolio, avoiding biases and allowing better-informed decisions.
“Combining species- and ecosystem-based studies would improve the decision makers solution portfolio, avoiding biases and allowing better-informed decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe best solution is the run with the lowest total cost and therefore the most efficient of the 100 runs.
“The best solution is the run with the lowest total cost and therefore the most efficient of the 100 runs (Game and Grantham 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Game and Grantham 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningHabitat-degraded lands within potential conservation areas in the central Coast (such as 9-19 in Fig. 4) are good options for restoration programs.
“Thus, habitat-degraded lands within potential conservation areas in the central Coast (such as 9–19 in Fig. 4) are good options for restoration programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationStudies focused on ecosystems found that protected areas already existing in the north represent Amazon ecosystems adequately.
“For example, studies focused on ecosystems found that protected areas already existing in the north represent Amazon ecosystems adequately (Sierra et al. 2002; Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 2002 source
- cites Cuesta-Camacho et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThe low importance may derive from the fact that a large number of PUs in the Amazon are equally important to achieve the proposed conservation goals, and thus virtually interchangeable.
“The low importance may derive from the fact that a large number of PUs in the Amazon are equally important to achieve the proposed conservation goals, and thus virtually interchangeable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Government's goal is to increase the protected area to encompass an additional 5% of the Ecuadorian territory.
“Regarding the Government's goal of increasing the protected area to encompass an additional 5% of the Ecuadorian territory [20], it is clear that our results largely exceed the established increase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe Chocó bioregion contains a high richness of target species and has been classified as a biodiversity hotspot because of its great diversity and high vulnerability.
“This bioregion contains a high richness of target species and has been classified as a biodiversity hotspot because of its great diversity and high vulnerability (Myers et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Myers et al. 2000 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningIt is necessary to propose a significant increase in the reserve system to meet the unachieved conservation goals.
“Large conservation gaps found in the current protected area network indicate that it is necessary to propose a significant increase in the reserve system to meet the unachieved conservation goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMore conservation efforts are needed in the northern Amazon, to protect irreplaceable areas around Cuyabeno and Yasuní (Fig. 4: 49-52).
“Consequently, our results suggest that more conservation efforts are needed in the northern Amazon, to protect irreplaceable areas around Cuyabeno and Yasuní (Fig. 4: 49–52).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationHistorically, the Coast has supported much of the country's agriculture and has suffered from significant urban development.
“Historically, this region has supported much of the country's agriculture and has suffered from significant urban development (Sierra et al. 1999; Sáenz and Onofa 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sierra et al. 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sáenz and Onofa 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis situation results from the combination of high habitat degradation, small extension of protected forests, and few protected areas, reducing the chances of selecting areas with high feasibility in this region.
“This situation results from the combination of high habitat degradation, small extension of protected forests, and few protected areas, reducing the chances of selecting areas with high feasibility in this region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningThis approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.
“This approach is useful for complementing protected area networks in countries with great biodiversity, insufficient biological information, and limited resources for conservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: PANE reserves are more likely to persist over time than other protected areas.
- Rests on an assumption: The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Interpretationown dataIt is more realistic to present an assessment of conservation priority and feasibility for the proposed areas, which may guide and support decision making.
“Therefore, it is more realistic to present an assessment of conservation priority and feasibility for the proposed areas, which may guide and support decision making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe summed solution provides the frequency in which each planning unit is selected across the 100 runs and indicates how important a planning unit is for creating an efficient reserve system.
“The summed solution provides the frequency in which each PU is selected across the 100 runs and therefore indicates how important a PU is for creating an efficient reserve system (Ardron et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ardron et al. 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningInformed measures will improve the effectiveness of reserve networks and, ultimately, will contribute to better protection for biodiversity, in contrast with an impromptu selection of sites.
“Informed measures will improve the effectiveness of reserve networks and, ultimately, will contribute to better protection for biodiversity, in contrast with an impromptu selection of sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningPrivate initiatives may assume the costs of establishing new conservation areas.
“However, private initiatives may assume the costs of establishing new conservation areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationcitationThe task ahead involves improving data availability and the limitations inherent to conservation planning, in order to enable us to act strategically in the face of increasing human pressure.
“Clearly, the task ahead involves improving data availability and the limitations inherent to conservation planning, in order to enable us to act strategically in the face of increasing human pressure (Rodrigues et al. 2004a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rodrigues et al. 2004a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe conservation of areas with only a small proportion of their extension within protected forest or buffer zones may be considered of high urgency, because although seemingly of low feasibility, they are important for complementing representativeness and are currently out of the protected area network.
“The conservation of areas with only a small proportion of their extension within protected forest or buffer zones may be also considered of high urgency, because although seemingly of low feasibility, they are important for complementing representativeness and are currently out of the protected area network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIt is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources.
“It is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources (Naidoo et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naidoo et al. 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationcitationThese and other limitations are likely to be minor compared with the urgency of taking informed conservation measures to slow the ongoing loss of biodiversity in tropical countries.
“However, these and other limitations are likely to be minor compared with the urgency of taking informed conservation measures to slow the ongoing loss of biodiversity in tropical countries (Groves et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groves et al. 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningOur reserve design shows some limitations inherent to the tools used.
“Our reserve design shows some limitations inherent to the tools used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningIn this context, it seems difficult to promote the establishment of new protected areas.
“Therefore, in this context, it seems difficult to promote the establishment of new protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and on the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests.
“We are aware that the establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and in the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests (Margules and Pressey 2000; Dudley and Parish 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Margules and Pressey 2000 source
- cites Dudley and Parish 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe absence of persistence criteria for selecting potential conservation areas (i.e., population dynamics or climate change related shifts) was not considered here, as they were beyond the scope of this study.
“Also, the absence of persistence criteria for selecting potential conservation areas (i.e., population dynamics or climate change related shifts) was not considered here, as they were beyond the scope of this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPrivate reserves have proved to be viable options for conservation in Ecuador and currently cover 4.6% of the country.
“In fact, private reserves have proved to be viable options for conservation in Ecuador and currently cover 4.6% of the country (Castaño-Uribe 2008; Elbers 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Castaño-Uribe 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Elbers 2011
The paper relies on this without support.
PANE reserves are more likely to persist over time than other protected areas.
“Herein, we looked for potential conservation areas that complement the biodiversity preserved only by PANE, as these reserves are more likely to persist over time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 809 selected species adequately represent terrestrial species diversity for conservation planning in continental Ecuador.
“To select the conservation targets, we focus on the best-studied species groups in Ecuador, which correspond to birds, amphibians, mammals, and vascular plants.”
“Specifically, we selected 809 terrestrial species: 182 amphibians, 69 birds, 52 mammals, and 506 plants that had enough occurrence records in Ecuador to generate reliable SDMs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Coast region has irreversible changes in land use.
“Most of the newly proposed areas are located in the Coast, a region with large conservation gaps and irreversible changes in land use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ecuador faces significant challenges to define new protected areas because of its great biodiversity, scarce biological information, and limited resources for conservation.
“Ecuador, as many other tropical countries, faces significant challenges to define new protected areas because of its great biodiversity, scarce biological information, and limited resources for conservation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.
“Several studies that propose new areas for conservation are limited to identify sites of importance, without analyzing their priority and feasibility of conservation.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Proposed areas are not more than twice the existing protected area
MinorTable 2 lists 49,843 km2 of PACs and 40,532 km2 protected by PANE. The proposed areas are about 1.23 times the existing protected area, not more than twice it.
“Indeed, in our work, the extension of PACs is more than twice the national protected area network.”
“| Continental Ecuador (total) | 40,532 | 16.3 | 49,843 | 20.1 | 90,375 | 36.4 |”
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,860
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · Cited by 15,396
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,829
Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 · Cited by 6,707
A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · Cited by 6,699
Systematic conservation planning
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012251 · Cited by 4,631
Olson, D. M., & Dinerstein, E. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x · Cited by 1,578
The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation
Olson, D. M., & Dinerstein, E. (2002) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/3298564 · Cited by 1,529
Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02422 · Cited by 1,525
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection
Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Williams, P. H. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-i · Cited by 1,047
Marxan and Relatives: Software for Spatial Conservation Prioritization
Ball, I. R., Possingham, H. P., & Watts, M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0014 · Cited by 940
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning
NAIDOO, R., BALMFORD, A., FERRARO, P., POLASKY, S., RICKETTS, T., & ROUGET, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003 · Cited by 892
The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010
Nations, U. (2010) · Millennium Development Goals Report · doi:10.18356/00399789-en · Cited by 829
Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools
Moilanen, A., Wilson, K. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2009) · Cited by 738
Global Gap Analysis: Priority Regions for Expanding the Global Protected-Area Network
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Akçakaya, H. R., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Chanson, J. S., Fishpool, L., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., et al. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1092:ggaprf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 729
A guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity
Glowka, L., Burhenne-Guilmin, F., & Synge, H. (1994) · Cited by 589
Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems?
Pressey, R. L. (1994) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030662.x · Cited by 533
Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology
Renner, I. W., & Warton, D. I. (2013) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01824.x · Cited by 463
Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., Keane, B., & Ross, C. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002932 · Cited by 411
Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park
Bass, M. S., Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., McCracken, S. F., Pitman, N. C. A., English, P. H., Swing, K., Villa, G., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 · Cited by 346
Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice
GROVES, C. R., JENSEN, D. B., VALUTIS, L. L., REDFORD, K. H., SHAFFER, M. L., SCOTT, J. M., BAUMGARTNER, J. V., HIGGINS, J. V., BECK, M. W., & ANDERSON, M. G. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0499:pfbcpc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 309
Principles of Conservation Biology
Hoelzel, A. R. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111628 · Cited by 205
Naidoo, R., & Iwamura, T. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025 · Cited by 176
The data void in modeling current and future distributions of tropical species
Feeley, K. J., & Silman, M. R. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02239.x · Cited by 175
Propuesta preliminar de un sistema de clasificacion de vegetacion para el Ecuador continental
Rodrigo Sierra, M. (1999) · Cited by 141
Pawar, S. S., Koo, M. S., Kelley, C., Ahmed, M. F., Chaudhuri, S., & Sarkar, S. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.012 · Cited by 140
Reserve Selection in Regions with Poor Biological Data
Gaston, K. J., & Rodrigues, A. S. L. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01268.x · Cited by 139
Habitat Suitability Models and the Shortfall in Conservation Planning for African Vertebrates
RONDININI, C., STUART, S., & BOITANI, L. (2005) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00204.x · Cited by 123
Sierra, R., Campos, F., & Chamberlin, J. (2002) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00006-3 · Cited by 122
Marxan good practices handbook
Ardron, J., Possingham, H. P., & Klein, C. J. (2010) · Cited by 104
Simulating the effects of using different types of species distribution data in reserve selection
Carvalho, S. B., Brito, J. C., Pressey, R. L., Crespo, E., & Possingham, H. P. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.010 · Cited by 81
The Contribution of Species Distribution Modelling to Conservation Prioritization
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. (2009) · Spatial Conservation Prioritization · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0006 · Cited by 73
(2011)
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Castaño‐Uribe C., 2008, Diagnóstico y situación actual de las áreas protegidas en América Latina y el Caribe, Informe Regional
- Cuesta‐Camacho F., 2006, Identificación de vacíos y prioridades de conservación para la biodiversidad terrestre en el Ecuador continental
- ECOLAP & Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, 2007, Guía del Patrimonio de Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Ecuador
- Fonseca R. M., 2003, Identificación preliminar de un corredor ecológico para mamíferos entre los Paques Nacionales Llanganates y Sangay, Revista de la Pontificia Universidad Católica, 71, 201
- Galindo J., 2005, Análisis de necesidad de financiamiento del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (SNAP) del Ecuador
- Game E. T., 2008, Marxan user manual: for marxan version 1.8.10
- McPherson M., 2008, GIS‐based modeling of Environmental Risk Surfaces (ERS) for conservation planning in Jamaica, J. Conserv. Plann., 4, 60
- Sáenz M., 2005, Reporte de los ecosistemas terrestres ecuatoriano. Indicadores de biodiversidad para su uso nacional
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liang, J., He, X., Zeng, G., Zhong, M., Gao, X., Li, X., Li, X., Wu, H., Feng, C., Xing, W., et al. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.086 · Cited by 222
Priority areas for biodiversity conservation in mainland Ecuador
Cuesta, F., Peralvo, M. F., Merino‐Viteri, A., Bustamante, M., Baquero, F., Freile, J. F., Muriel, P., & Torres‐Carvajal, O. (2017) · Neotropical Biodiversity · doi:10.1080/23766808.2017.1295705 · Cited by 146
Fajardo, J. A. T., Lessmann, J., Bonaccorso, E., Devenish, C., & Muñoz, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114367 · Cited by 145
Self-citationLessmann, J., Fajardo, J. A. T., Muñoz, J., & Bonaccorso, E. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2099 · Cited by 123
Self-citationBax, V., & Francesconi, W. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.086 · Cited by 114
Rivas, C. A., Guerrero‐Casado, J., & Navarro-Cerillo, R. M. (2021) · Forest Ecosystems · doi:10.1186/s40663-021-00329-5 · Cited by 99
Ortega-Andrade, H. M., Rodes‐Blanco, M., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., Arévalo, N. G., de Vargas-Machuca, K. G. L., Sánchez‐Nivicela, J. C., Armijos-Ojeda, D., Andrade, J. F. C., Reyes-Puig, C. P., Riera, A. B. Q., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251027 · Cited by 84
Delgado-Jaramillo, M. I., Aguiar, L., Machado, R. B., & Bernard, E. (2020) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13043 · Cited by 72
Kleemann, J., Koo, H., Hensen, I., Mendieta‐Leiva, G., Kahnt, B., Kurze, C., Inclán, D. J., Cuenca, P., Noh, J. K., Hoffmann, M. H., et al. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109404 · Cited by 71
Glassfrogs of Ecuador: Diversity, Evolution, and Conservation
Guayasamin, J. M., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., McDiarmid, R. W., Peña, P., & Hutter, C. R. (2020) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d12060222 · Cited by 70
Ortega-Andrade, H. M., Prieto-Torres, D. A., Gómez-Lora, I., & Lizcano, D. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121137 · Cited by 63
Aguirre, W. E., Alvarez‐Mieles, G., Yancha, F. A., Burgos-Morán, R., Cucalón, R. V., Escobar‐Camacho, D., Jácome‐Negrete, I., Jiménez‐Prado, P., Laaz, E., Miranda‐Troya, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.14844 · Cited by 62
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests
Prieto-Torres, D. A., Nori, J., & Rojas‐Soto, O. (2018) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.025 · Cited by 60
Worldwide Research on Land Use and Land Cover in the Amazon Region
Montalván-Burbano, N., Velástegui-Montoya, A., Gurumendi-Noriega, M., Morante-Carballo, F., & Adami, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116039 · Cited by 59
Fastré, C., Possingham, H. P., Strubbe, D., & Matthysen, E. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z · Cited by 54
Dry forest is more threatened but less protected than evergreen forest in Ecuador’s coastal region
Rivas, C. A., Navarro-Cerillo, R. M., Johnston, J. C., & Guerrero‐Casado, J. (2020) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892920000077 · Cited by 46
Prieto-Torres, D. A., Nori, J., Rojas‐Soto, O., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109083 · Cited by 42
Prieto-Torres, D. A., Rojas‐Soto, O., Santiago‐Alarcón, D., Bonaccorso, E., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2019) · Ardeola · doi:10.13157/arla.66.2.2019.ra1 · Cited by 38
Self-citationNoh, J. K., Echeverría, C., Gaona, G., Kleemann, J., Koo, H., Fürst, C., & Cuenca, P. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11020287 · Cited by 36
Andrade‐Diaz, M. S., Sarquis, J. A., Loiselle, B. A., Giraudo, A. R., & Gómez, J. M. D. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221901 · Cited by 33
Burbano‐Girón, J., Jantke, K., Molina-Berbeo, M. A., Buriticá-Mejía, N., Urbina-Cardona, N., Sánchez‐Clavijo, L. M., & Andrés Etter, R. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109421 · Cited by 30
Ríos-Alvear, G. D., Meneses, P., Ortega-Andrade, H. M., Santos, C., Muzo, A., de Vargas-Machuca, K. G. L., Bentley, A. G., & Villamarín, F. (2024) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105039 · Cited by 29
Xia, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Qian, Z. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1471653 · Cited by 29
Conserving Ecosystem Diversity in the Tropical Andes
Comer, P. J., Valdez, J. W., Pereira, H. M., Acosta‐Muñoz, C., Campos, F., Bonet, F. J., Claros, X. R., Castro, L., Dallmeier, F., Domic, E., et al. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14122847 · Cited by 28
Koo, H., Kleemann, J., Cuenca, P., Noh, J. K., & Fürst, C. (2024) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101652 · Cited by 27
Bax, V., Castro-Nunez, A. C., & Francesconi, W. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12030375 · Cited by 26
Prieto-Torres, D. A., & Pinilla‐Buitrago, G. E. (2017) · Therya · doi:10.12933/therya-17-478 · Cited by 25
Liang, J., Gao, X., Zeng, G., Hua, S., Zhong, M., Li, X., & Li, X. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18594-2 · Cited by 24
Noh, J. K., Echeverría, C., Kleemann, J., Koo, H., Fürst, C., & Cuenca, P. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237877 · Cited by 23
Rivas, C. A., Guerrero‐Casado, J., & Navarro-Cerrillo, R. M. (2023) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126549 · Cited by 20
Choe, H., Thorne, J. H., Huber, P. R., Lee, D. K., & Quinn, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190754 · Cited by 20
Cost-effective protection of biodiversity in the western Amazon
Lessmann, J., Fajardo, J., Bonaccorso, E., & Bruner, A. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.022 · Cited by 20
Self-citationSolórzano, C., Intriago-Alcívar, L., & Guerrero‐Casado, J. (2021) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2020-0145 · Cited by 20
Guevara, J. E., Pitman, N. C. A., ter Steege, H., Mogollón, H. F., Cerón, C., Palacios, W. A., Oleas, N. H., & Fine, P. V. A. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3481 · Cited by 18
Astudillo, P. X., Barros, S., Mejía, D., Villegas, F. R., Siddons, D. C., & Latta, S. C. (2024) · Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research · doi:10.1080/15230430.2023.2299362 · Cited by 17
Amador, L., Soto-Gamboa, M. R., & Guayasamin, J. M. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5593 · Cited by 16
Fajardo, J. A. T., Lessmann, J., Devenish, C., Bonaccorso, E., Felicísimo, Á. M., Rojas‐Runjaic, F. J. M., Rojas, H., Lentino, M., Muñoz, J., & Mateo, R. G. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27365-7 · Cited by 15
Self-citationGómez, A. J. Q., Rivas, C. A., Navarro-Cerrillo, R. M., & González‐Moreno, P. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13116418 · Cited by 15
Rivas, C. A., Guerrero‐Casado, J., & Navarro-Cerrillo, R. M. (2024) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12770 · Cited by 15
Zambrano, R. H., Centeno, V. A., Solórzano, C., Crespo-Gascón, S., & Guerrero‐Casado, J. (2019) · La Técnica Revista de las Agrociencias · doi:10.33936/la_tecnica.v0i22.1630 · Cited by 15
Liuyang, Y. A. N. G., HUANG, L., Zhang, H., Lee, P.-S., Zhang, N., Ruiqing, C. A. I., En, L. I., Pan, T., & Wu, X. (2023) · Asian Herpetological Research · doi:10.3724/ahr.2095-0357.2022.0046 · Cited by 14
Guerrero‐Casado, J., Cedeño, R. I., Johnston, J. C., & Gunther, M. S. (2020) · Primates · doi:10.1007/s10329-019-00787-0 · Cited by 13
Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
Vu, X. D., Csaplovics, E., Marrs, C., & Nguyễn, T. T. (2022) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f13091341 · Cited by 12
Diversity of wild yams (Dioscorea spp., Dioscoreaceae) collected in continental Africa
Magwé‐Tindo, J., Zapfack, L., & Sonké, B. (2015) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-015-1031-4 · Cited by 12
Jiang, Z., Shao, M., & Wang, J. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15010006 · Cited by 10
Importance of connectivity for carnivore richness and occupancy in fragmented biodiversity hotspots
Hurtado, C. M., Curveira‐Santos, G., García-Olaechea, Á., Appleton, R. D., Barros‐Diaz, C., Hermosilla, T., Lizcano, D. J., Salas, J. A., Balbuena, D., Vega, Z., et al. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70096 · Cited by 9
Escobar‐Camacho, D., Barragán, K. S., Guayasamin, J. M., Gavilanes, G. I., & Encalada, A. C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298970 · Cited by 9
Lin, L., He, J. G., Lyu, R., Luo, Y., Yao, M., Xie, L., & Cui, G. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119211 · Cited by 9
Reyes-Puig, J. P., Reyes-Puig, C. P., Pacheco-Esquivel, J., Recalde, S., Recalde, F., Recalde, D., Salazar, J., Peña, E., Paredes, S., Robalino, M., et al. (2023) · Biodiversity Data Journal · doi:10.3897/bdj.11.e98119 · Cited by 8
Insights on biodiversity drivers to predict species richness in tropical forests at the local scale
Mateo, R. G., Arellano, G., Gómez‐Rubio, V., Tello, J. S., Fuentes, A. F., Cayola, L., Loza, M. I., Rivero, V. C., & Macía, M. J. (2022) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110133 · Cited by 8
Witt, A., & Hammill, E. (2018) · Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2933 · Cited by 8
Identifying conservation gap in biodiversity hotspot area: Single flagship species or multi-species?
Wang, M., Gan, J. Y., Guo, G., Breuste, J., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126835 · Cited by 7
Biocomercio y biodiversidad en el Ecuador. Oportunidades.
Cossío, N. S., Radice, M., Luna, M., & Fuentes, N. N. M. (2018) · Revista Científica ECOCIENCIA · doi:10.21855/ecociencia.36.15 · Cited by 7
Montoya, J. V., Ríos‐Touma, B., Lujan, N. K., Sánchez, F. S., Proaño, A., Tejera, E., Jimenes-Vargas, K., Sánchez, L., & Cuesta, F. (2025) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14451-2 · Cited by 6
Systematic Conservation Planning as a Tool for the Assessment of Protected Areas Network in Jordan
Boulad, N., Shogoor, S. S. A., Sahwan, W., Al-Ouran, N., & Schütt, B. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11010056 · Cited by 6
Evidence of population genetic structure in Ecuadorian Andean bears
Cueva, D. F., Zug, R., Pozo, M. J., Molina, S., Cisneros, R., Bustamante, M. R., & Torres, M. D. L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53003-5 · Cited by 6
Whiskers in the city: domestic cat predation in Ecuadorian coastal cities and associated factors
Panchana, K., Herrera, I., Vargas, A., Mella-Méndez, I., & Flores‐Peredo, R. (2024) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-024-01628-9 · Cited by 6
Shao, J., Diao, Y., Zhang, Q., & Jinnan, W. (2024) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03336 · Cited by 6
Nolan, V., Kaky, E. D. A., Alatawi, A. S., & Gilbert, F. S. (2022) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-022-00290-y · Cited by 6
Grossi, M. A., Draper, D., Apodaca, M. J., Vitali, M. S., Pataro, L., Katinas, L., & Sáiz, J. C. M. (2016) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1245-0 · Cited by 6
Torres-Celi, J., Knoke, T., & Quezada, L. M. C. (2025) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-025-01250-4 · Cited by 5
Franco-Mena, D., la Riva, I. D., Vega-Yánez, M. A., Székely, P., Amador, L., Batallas, D., Reyes-Puig, J. P., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., Venegas-Valencia, K., Galeano, S. P., et al. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.17712 · Cited by 4
Priority areas for conservation of primates in a threatened Amazonian savanna
Calle‐Rendón, B. R., de Toledo, J. J., Mustin, K., de Vasconcelos, I. M., & Hilário, R. R. (2021) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126109 · Cited by 4
The edge of the subtropics: a preliminary list of the birds of San José de Sumaco, Ecuador
Vallely, A. C., Ertl, F., & García, T. S. (2023) · Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club · doi:10.25226/bboc.v143i4.2023.a3 · Cited by 3
Guerrero‐Casado, J., Seoane, J. M., Aguirre, N., & Torres‐Porras, J. (2021) · Neotropical Biology and Conservation · doi:10.3897/neotropical.16.e63414 · Cited by 3
Determinación de polifenoles en cinco especies amazónicas con potencial antioxidante
Radice, M., Sánchez, L. R. B., Quintana, M. P., Grefa, J. B. C., Tapuy, A., Carrión, A. R., Neill, D. A., & Chiurato, M. A. (2017) · Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología · doi:10.59410/racyt-v06n01ep06-0072 · Cited by 3
Mo, Y., Park, J.-H., Son, Y.-H., & Lee, D. K. (2016) · Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology · doi:10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.171 · Cited by 2
de Medeiros, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.14201/gredos.151024 · Cited by 2
Shyvers, J. E., Tarbox, B. C., Monroe, A. P., Lanen, N. J. V., Robb, B. S., Buchholtz, E. K., Duchardt, C. J., Edmunds, D. R., O’Donnell, M. S., Schmidt, N. D. V., et al. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72214 · Cited by 1
Amador, L., Gómez, C., Londoño-Guarnizo, C. A., López‐Caro, J., & Arteaga, A. (2017) · Check List · doi:10.15560/13.1.2032 · Cited by 1
Developing methodologies for the global in situ conservation of crop wild relatives
Vincent, H. (2016) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 1
Using Anthropogenic Risks to Inform Salmonid Conservation at the Landscape Scale
Witt, A. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/5c8d-8855
Rodríguez, C. G. (2019) · UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid)
Müller, A. (2020) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · doi:10.17617/2.3243038
Assessment of the Conservation Area Network Development in Markazi Province Using Landscape Metrics
Ansari, A. (2021) · Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.47176/ijae.10.3.9365
Rivas, C. A., Guerrero‐Casado, J., & Navarro-Cerillo, R. M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14954684
Study of potential of reforested areas in the province of Manabí (Ecuador)
Quimis Gómez, A. J. (2023) · Universidad de Córdoba Insitutional Repository (Universidad de Córdoba)
Mapping nature-based solutions for societal challenges. A product of the SPACES coalition
UNEP-WCMC (2023) · IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis)
Diversity of amphibians and squamate reptiles in the upper Napo River basin, Ecuador
Reyes-Puig, C. P., Brito‐Zapata, D., Guayasamin, J. M., Vieira, J., & Cisneros-Heredia, D. F. (2025) · Community Ecology · doi:10.1007/s42974-025-00285-y
Birds in the Concrete Forest: Nest-site Use on Human-made Structures across Western Ecuador
Velasco-Cedeño, D., Viteri-Basso, E., Vivas, W., & Guerrero-Campoverde, A. (2026) · El Hornero · doi:10.56178/eh.v41i1.1538
생물다양성 보전을 위한 다양한 경관에서 보호지역의 체계적인 보전계획 수립
모용원 (2018) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Herrera-Feijoo, R. J., Morales‐Barbero, J., Torres, B., & Mateo, R. G. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.08.757788
Herrera-Feijoo, R. J., Morales‐Barbero, J., Torres, B., & Mateo, R. G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7644093
Metadata
- Authors
- Lessmann, J., Muñoz, J., & Bonaccorso, E.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Indoamérica (EC)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lessmann, Janeth
- Venue
- Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2410-2422
- ISSN
- 2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4203289
- OpenAlex
- W2082880167
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (CGL2012-38624-C02-02)
- Universidad Tecnol�gica Indoam�rica (Convocatoria 2011)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- systematic conservation planning, protected area network, conservation gaps, species distribution modeling, conservation prioritization, feasibility assessment, Marxan, MaxEnt, biodiversity conservation, Ecuador, Amazon, Andes, coastal areas, land use change, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review