The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford Handbook of Program Design and Implementation Evaluation
Abstract
Why do many social programs have such a poor track record? What can we do to maximize a program’s chance of success? If a program shows promise, how can we scale it up? To answer these questions confronting policymakers, and to ensure that strong programs are designed, developed, implemented, and taken to scale, appropriate evaluation approaches must be used throughout a program’s life cycle. In The Oxford Handbook on Program Design and Implementation Evaluation, Dr. Anu Rangarajan surfaces insights and expertise from a team of eminent scholars to create a comprehensive and actionable toolbox of evaluation methodologies that can be used to examine social programs throughout their life cycle. The methodologies presented in the Handbook describe how to conduct developmental evaluations, perform rapid-cycle evaluations, employ implementation science concepts, assess program effectiveness in the absence of a true counterfactual, measure cost-effectiveness, scale up promising interventions, and assess systems change. Incorporating these approaches at every stage of a program’s life cycle will maximize its chances of success; doing so consistently across social programs will help improve their impact overall. This Handbook is an action-oriented primary resource for social researchers, faculty and students, program practitioners, policy analysts, and funders of social programs and evaluations. By providing real-world examples of each approach alongside methodological guidance, and b…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It highlights the importance of comprehending implementation determinants-factors such as financial resource Availability that can either aid or hinder implementation efforts-and using these insights to guide strategies in child protection (Rangarajan, 2023).”
From Financial Resource Availability and Implementation of Child Protection and Safeguarding Programs in Kwale County, Kenya (2024) · cites this paper as Rangarajan, 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wainaina Ndungu, A., Wambua, S. W., & Ochoi, K. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24sep842 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2023-09-18
- OpenAlex
- W4386828048
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- program design, program implementation evaluation, social programs, developmental evaluation, implementation science, program effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, scaling up interventions, systemic change, program life cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review