The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative
Abstract
This article focuses on the idea of sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative. Sociocultural theory has long been used as a lens to explain the processes involved in second language learning and instruction. This article extensively refers to some of the major theorists in the field of linguistics. It then presents selected data and findings from a recent study by Ferreira on ESL writing instruction that adopts Vygotsky's original perspective on theory and research. Two studies, by Negueruela and Poehner, have focused heavily on grammar learning and are already well known in the literature. These studies have approached grammar as conceptual knowledge that may help learners more effectively to create meanings that express their particular communicative intentions. This theory not only informs but also guides research carried out under controlled laboratory conditions, which includes the classroom setting when it is treated as a quasi-experimental venue.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This can be interpreted through Vygotsky's (1978) sociocultural theory, specifically the ZPD, which emphasizes scaffolded support to help learners advance beyond their current competence (Lantolf, 2010;van Compernolle & Williams, 2013).”
From Integrating ChatGPT for vocabulary learning and retention: A classroom-based study of Saudi EFL learners (2025) · cites this paper as Lantolf, 2010
In the citing paper
“This progression mirrors the shift from other-regulation to self-regulation, a hallmark of SCT-based learning design (Lantolf, 2010).”
From Integrating ChatGPT for vocabulary learning and retention: A classroom-based study of Saudi EFL learners (2025) · cites this paper as Lantolf, 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810383328 · Cited by 355
Self-citationSociocultural theory and second language pedagogy
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2013) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168813482933 · Cited by 45
Abdelhalim, S. M., & Alsehibany, R. (2025) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73635 · Cited by 17
“This progression mirrors the shift from other-regulation to self-regulation, a hallmark of SCT-based learning design (Lantolf, 2010).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lantolf, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lantolf, James P.
- ORCID
- Lantolf, James P.
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-09-03
- OpenAlex
- W2621756158
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, ESL writing instruction, Vygotsky, grammar learning, conceptual knowledge, communicative intention, classroom research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review