Cited by 45EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducational and Psychological AssessmentsSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Sociocultural theory and second language pedagogy

Open access
van Compernolle, Rémi A, Williams, Lawrence·2013·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Vygotskian sociocultural theory of mind (SCT) has attracted the attention of second language (L2) researchers and educators since the publication of the papers of Frawley and Lantolf (Frawley & Lantolf, 1985; Lantolf & Frawley, 1984). Since that time, SCT-informed research has become an established part of the landscape of L2 acquisition (SLA), pedagogy, and assessment (Lantolf & Thorne, 2006), as evidenced by the growing number of journal articles and book chapters, dissertations, edited volumes, and books focused on SCT, as well as the presence of SCT in handbooks and other reference texts centered on theories of SLA (see Center for Language Acquisition, 2012). The majority of this research has, however, used SCT as a theoretical lens through which to interpret questions related to SLA rather than as a theoretical motivation for designing L2 pedagogies. In fact, as pointed out by Lantolf (2008), it was not until Negueruela’s (2003) doctoral research that Vygotsky’s proposals were systematically incorporated into a coherent L2 pedagogical program. Since then, a number of studies (including several doctoral theses) have been conducted to explore the impact of SCT-informed pedagogies on adult SLA (e.g. papers in Lantolf & Poehner, 2008). This research has included, centrally, work on dynamic assessment and concept-based instruction, but also perspectives on other forms of social, or human, mediation intentionally introduced into L2 educational contexts in order to promote development. The importance of pedagogical activity for SCT cannot be understated. Indeed, one has to acknowledge that Vygotsky did not conceive of pedagogies derived from his proposals to be mere applications of the theory; that is, the application of theoretically informed teaching ‘techniques’. Instead, pedagogical intervention was itself part and parcel of further developing the theory and of continuing to understand not only the nature of human cognition but, crucially, the processes by which the mind develops (e.g. Vygotsky, 1997). This is what Vygotsky referred to as ‘praxis’; the unification of theory and practical activity. As Lantolf and Poehner (2011) explain: 482933 LTR17310.1177/1362168813482933Language Teaching ResearchEditorial 2013

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168813482933

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  2. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). Educational psychology . Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • University of North Texas (US)
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2013-06-12
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
277-281
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2128174045
Cited by
45
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
sociocultural theory, second language teaching, dynamic assessment, concept-based instruction, human mediation, praxis, adult second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review