The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation
Abstract
Social cognitive theory is a theory of psychological functioning that emphasizes learning from the social environment. This chapter focuses on Bandura's social cognitive theory, which postulates reciprocal interactions among personal, behavioral, and social/environmental factors. Persons use various vicarious, symbolic, and self-regulatory processes as they strive to develop a sense of agency in their lives. Key motivational processes are goals and self-evaluations of progress, outcome expectations, values, social comparisons, and self-efficacy. People set goals and evaluate their goal progress. The perception of progress sustains self-efficacy and motivation. Individuals act in accordance with their values and strive for outcomes they desire. Social comparisons with others provide further information on their learning and goal attainment. Self-efficacy is an especially critical influence on motivation and affects task choices, effort, persistence, and achievement. Suggestions are given for future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings
Pajares, F. (1996) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170653 · Cited by 4,688
Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308321456 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationModeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781
Self-citationHenson, R. K. (2002) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3703_1 · Cited by 275
Guay, F., Boivin, M., & Hodges, E. V. E. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.564 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Motivation and social cognitive theory
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 · Cited by 2,416
Self-citationDesigning for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience
Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797 · Cited by 888
Makransky, G., Borre‐Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12375 · Cited by 532
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002 · Cited by 321
Adolescents' computer performance: The role of self-concept and motivational aspects
Christoph, G., Goldhammer, F., Zylka, J., & Hartig, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.004 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-09-18
- Pages
- 13-27
- OpenAlex
- W290055630
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0002
- The paper
- Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.