Social comparison processes and academic achievement: The dependence of the development of self-evaluations on friends' performance.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of social comparison processes in children's self-evaluations. Children's aptitudes to gauge their self-evaluations of their abilities in school activities (i.e., perceived academic competence) on the basis of their actual performance depended on how well their reciprocated friends performed academically. Self-evaluations of performance were not affected when the comparison was based on levels of nonreciprocated friends' achievement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In second through fourth grade, children's own achievement was a weaker predictor of their academic self-concept when they had high-achieving friends.
“in second through fourth grade, children's own achievement was found to be a weaker predictor of their academic self-concept when they had high-achieving friends (Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
In elementary school, social comparison effects on academic self-concept have been found only when comparisons were to reciprocated (as opposed to non-reciprocated) friends.
“a couple of studies have found social comparison effects in elementary school to only affect academic self-concept when comparisons were to reciprocated (as opposed to non-reciprocated) friends (e.g., Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2003;Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
There is some evidence that youths' own academic skill level moderates the effect of peers' academic skills on youths' academic self-concept.
“there is some evidence that youths' own academic skill level moderates the effect of peers' academic skills on youths' academic self-concept (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
Affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youth's academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills.
“affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youths' academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Dweck, 2002;Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
Sharing and disclosure within children's mutual friendships make them the most psychologically meaningful and accessible target for social comparison.
“the sharing and disclosure within children's mutual friendships make them the most psychologically meaningful and accessible target for social comparison”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
Past research on social comparison has typically focused on comparisons to friends or comparisons to classmates in general.
“Past research on social comparison has typically either focused on comparisons to friends (e.g., Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2003;Guay et al., 1999) or comparisons to classmates in general (e.g., Blanton et al., 1999;Marsh, Kong, & Hau, 2000).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Guay et al., 1999
Cites
Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
Tesser, A. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60227-0 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431610384487 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guay, F., Boivin, M., & Hodges, E. V. E.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-568
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1993477240
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- social comparison, academic performance, self-assessment, perceived academic competence, peer performance, children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review