The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Dilemmas of Asymmetric Conflict
Abstract
Contemporary asymmetric war presents democratic regime with significant challenges. First, the status of non-state actors is ambiguous. Terrorists are not entitled to the protection of international law, but guerrillas should enjoy significant privileges that states do not always acknowledge. Second, lack of uniforms endangers the core obligation to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants. Third, active participation by civilians puts non-combatant immunity at risk if such civilians are liable to defensive harming. Fourth, the increasing use of soft or non-kinetic tactics in the form of media, cyber, legal, and economic warfare is not governed by international law, and may offer non-state actors a significant advantage. Finally, the laws and norms that bind guerrillas are a work in progress. Ideally, they should comply fully with the principles of military ethics, but in practice, some leniency is unavoidable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Yet the advent of cyber-capabilities has complicated this balancing act, since cyber-operations can deliver major advantages without causing fatalities, a fact that should minimize the stigma against targeting noncombatants (Gross 2018).”
From Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism (2023) · cites this paper as Gross 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism
Shandler, R., Kostyuk, N., & Oppenheimer, H. (2023) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad006 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Gross, Michael L.
- ORCID
- Gross, Michael L.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2018-03-01
- Pages
- 232-246
- OpenAlex
- W2796076156
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Keywords
- asymmetric warfare, non-state actors, guerrilla movements, terrorists, non-combatant immunity, cyber warfare, economic warfare, media warfare, international humanitarian law, military ethics, democratic regimes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review