The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phenomenological Psychopathology and America’s Social Life-World
Abstract
This article discusses contemporary problems in the United States regarding mental illness. It introduces the concept of being epistemically adrift, a concept related to epistemic injustice, but in the sense that too many interdisciplinary disagreements about the nature and existence of mental illness prevents those living with them able to determine how to live flourishing lives. Examining the life-world informed by psychiatry, anti-psychiatry, and the criminal justice system/mass industrial prison complex through a phenomenological lens, we see that there are many confused notions of responsibility for those with mental illness, leaving them epistemically adrift and left to their own devices for navigating their own lives and health. The article concludes with a call for more open engagement with the lived experience of individuals in order to better understand how to live within mental disorder.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The over-proliferation of neurotypical signposts may even leave autistic people”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Jackson 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, J.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Jake
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2018-03-07
- Pages
- 986-1003
- OpenAlex
- W2979396297
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, mental illness, phenomenological psychopathology, antipsychiatry, mass incarceration, lived experience, eudaimonia, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review