CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy

Open access
Manríquez Roa, Tania, Biller-Andorno, Nikola, Trachsel, Manuel·2021·Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics
DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.91
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Current developments in artificial intelligence (AI) for mental health have raised important ethical debates around its uses in psychotherapy, including how and under what circumstances AI may be valuable to improve and expand access to psychotherapy. This chapter discusses the use of chatbots and AI tools as supplements to psychotherapy delivered by persons, and as supervised primary treatments. It presents ethical guidelines and standards for AI and mobile apps in mental health, and discusses how these developments are relevant in the ethics of AI in psychotherapy. Current discussions on the role of chatbots and other AI tools for mental health rely mostly on a perspective of justice. The chapter aims to enrich the debate by complementing a perspective of justice with one of care and using both approaches to reflect on the topics of respect of autonomy, access to treatment, non-discrimination, and fulfillment of people’s needs and care. It argues that trustworthy AI tools may help to establish caring relationships between therapist and patient, and contribute to the therapeutic process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.91

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 2009, Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review., Journal of Medical Internet Research
  2. Collins, S. (2017). “Care Ethics: The Four Key Claims.” In Moral Reasoning: A Text and Reader on Ethics and Contemporary Moral Issues (ed. D. Morrow, pp. 192–204). New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. 2019, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
  4. 2018, Psychotherapy
  5. 2010, Enhancing Brains: What Are We Afraid Of?, Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science
  6. 2017, Efficacy of Self-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data., JAMA Psychiatry
  7. 2015, Mobile Technology Boosts the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy and Behavioral Interventions: A Meta-Analysis., Behavior Modification
  8. 2019, What is Psychotherapy?
  9. 2018, The Lancet
  10. 2017, The Datafication of Health., Annual Review of Anthropology
  11. 2019, A Patient Post Hoc Perspective on Advantages and Disadvantages of Blended Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Depression: A Qualitative Content Analysis., Psychotherapy Research
  12. Mental Disorders: Key Facts.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Manríquez Roa, T., Biller-Andorno, N., & Trachsel, M.
Affiliations
  • Bioethics, University of Zurich
  • Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich
  • University of Zurich (CH)
ORCID
Trachsel, Manuel
Venue
Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2021-01-13
Pages
744-758
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.91
OpenAlex
W3168591764
Cited by
19
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.21
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in psychotherapy, chatbots, AI ethics, mental health, access to psychotherapy, justice, care ethics, respect for autonomy, non-discrimination, therapeutic relationship, trustworthy AI, mental health apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review