Cited by 765Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)AI and HR Technologies

AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair

Open access
Zou, James, Schiebinger, Londa·2018·Nature

Abstract

Computer scientists must identify sources of bias, de-bias training data and develop artificial-intelligence algorithms that are robust to skews in the data, argue James Zou and Londa Schiebinger. Computer scientists must identify sources of bias, de-bias training data and develop artificial-intelligence algorithms that are robust to skews in the data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zou and Schiebinger identified gender biases in AI algorithms.

    “Similarly, Zou and Schiebinger [51] identified gender biases in AI algorithms, underscoring the intersection of technology with broader social justice issues.”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as Zou and Schiebinger [51]

  • AI systems may be systematically biased toward different outputs, which may lead to different or even unfair treatment, on the basis of extant features.

    “It has been shown that AI systems may be systematically biased toward different outputs, which may lead to different or even unfair treatment, on the basis of extant features53,57–59.”
  • Criticism around large models has been growing, especially ethical concerns regarding societal biases, carbon footprint, misuse and misinterpretation, privatization of AI research, and research opportunity costs.

    “criticism around large models has been growing lately [9], especially ethical concerns regarding undesirable and often inscrutable societal biases percolating the models [9, 120], carbon footprint [9, 99], misuse and misinterpretation [9], privatization of AI research [99], and even research opportunity costs [49].”
  • Abstractions in chatbot platforms can hide underlying information about machine learning models, AI decision-making, and latent bias in training data that can translate into social biases.

    “abstractions can also hide underlying information about machine learning models, AI decision-making, as well as latent bias in the training data (e.g., [101]) that can translate into social biases (e.g., [120]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V. & Kalai, A. Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. 2016, 4349-4357 (2016).
  2. Wagner, C., Garcia, D., Jadidi, M. & Strohmaier, M. Proc. 9th Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 454-463 (2015).
  3. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 81, 1-15 (2018).
  4. Gebru, T. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ abs/1803.09010 (2018). · arXiv
  5. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O. & Zemel, R. Proc. 3rd Innov. Theor. Comp. Sci. Conf. 2012, 214-226 (2012).
  6. Zemel, R., Wu, Y., Swersky, K., Pitassi, T. & Dwork, C. Proc. 30th Int. Conf. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 28, III-325-III-333 (2013).
  7. Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D. & Zou, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3635-E3644 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zou, James
  • Schiebinger, Londa
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
559
Issue
7714
Pages
324-326
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2883147591
Cited by
765
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 5
FWCI
127.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
algorithmic bias, sexism, racism, training data bias, bias mitigation, algorithmic discrimination, skewed data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Race Factors, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, Male, Natural Language Processing, Sex Factors, Social Justice, Neural Networks, Computer, Racism, Sexism, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review