The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Globalization of Innovation: The Role of Multinational Enterprises
Abstract
Economic globalization implies a growing interdependence of locations and economic units across countries and regions. Technological change and multinational enterprises (MNEs) are among the primary driving forces of this process. This article attempts to evaluate the changing extent and importance of MNEs as conduits for cross-border knowledge flows. MNEs affect the development and diffusion of innovations across national borders through a number of mechanisms, among which FDI (through which MNEs acquire existing assets abroad or set-up new wholly or majority owned activities in foreign markets) is only one. International knowledge flows also move through trade, licensing, cross-patenting activities, and international technological and scientific collaborations. These other modalities involve a wide variety of economic actors, but the MNE occupies a central role among these actors. This article emphasizes the MNE's multifaceted role in the more general process of the globalization of innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy
(1995) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035299 · Cited by 419
Towards a theory of the technology-based firm
Granstrand, O. (1998) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00067-5 · Cited by 418
Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in
Narula, R. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00148-2 · Cited by 304
Self-citationOverseas Research and Development by US-Based Firms
Mansfield, E., Teece, D., & Romeo, A. (1979) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2553190 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises
Zhang, Z., Guan, D., Wang, R., Meng, J., Zheng, H., Zhu, K., & Du, H. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0895-9 · Cited by 235
Malecki, E. J. (2011) · International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management · doi:10.1504/ijeim.2011.040821 · Cited by 171
Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D: a game-theoretic approach
Sanna-Randaccio, F., & Veugelers, R. (2007) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400249 · Cited by 171
Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry
Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. D. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.005 · Cited by 140
Self-citationFragmenting global business processes: A protection for proprietary information
Gooris, J., & Peeters, C. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2015.44 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Narula, R., & Zanfei, A.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-09-02
- Pages
- 318-346
- OpenAlex
- W2132373415
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 70.03
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globalization of Innovation: The Role of Multinational Enterprises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0012
- The paper
- Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2009). Globalization of Innovation: The Role of Multinational Enterprises. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.