The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heritage
Abstract
This chapter is both an exploration of the relationship between contemporary archaeology and heritage, and a contemporary archaeology of heritage. This first part of this chapter explores heritage as a manifestation of a late modern experience society in which the past is perceived to be both immanent (contained within) and imminent (impending) in the present. The second explores the role of archaeology in investigating heritage as a contemporary social phenomenon. Drawing on two brief examples, it considers the production of heritage ‘experiences’ as a key manifestation of the nature of heritage in late modern experience societies. Each heritage site is understood to represent an assemblage (or agencement ) composed of a number of different ancient and modern devices, technologies, and apparatuses ( dispositifs ) which might be subject to archaeological investigation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thought and theory have developed and expanded from a focus largely on material culture to inclusion and consideration of the immaterial and their relationship to people, landscape and environment.”
From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as Harrison 2013
In the citing paper
“Along with this archaeology and HM has moved from the exclusive domain of academia into a far broader field of stakeholders, ushering in greater criticality heritage studies generally (e.g.Harrison 2013; Ashley and Frank 2014).”
From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as Harrison 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change
McCall, V., & Gray, C. (2014) · Museum Management and Curatorship · doi:10.1080/09647775.2013.869852 · Cited by 255
Harrison, R. (2015) · The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research · doi:10.1057/9781137293565_19 · Cited by 55
Self-citationINSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing Memory, Place‐based Care and Cultural Citizenships
Novoa, M. (2022) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.13143 · Cited by 24
Teaching Anti-Colonial Archaeology
Hutchings, R., & La Salle, M. (2014) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-014-9250-y · Cited by 19
Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms
Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., et al. (2018) · Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites · doi:10.1080/13505033.2018.1559423 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, R.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-10-01
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
