The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research
Open accessAbstract
This handbook provides a broad introduction to qualitative research to those with little to no background in the subject while simultaneously providing substantive contributions to the field that will be of interest to even the most experienced researchers. The first two sections explore the history of qualitative research, ethical perspectives, and philosophical/theoretical approaches. The next three sections focus on the major methods of qualitative practice, as well as on newer approaches (such as arts-based research and internet research); area studies often excluded (such as museum studies and disaster studies); and mixed methods and participatory methods (such as community-based research). The next section covers key issues including data analysis, interpretation, writing, and assessment. The final section offers a commentary about politics and research and the move toward public scholarship. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research is intended for students of all levels, faculty, and researchers across the social sciences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Transcripts were analysed using a deductive coding and thematic analysis approach by experienced qualitative researchers (SCP, JJ and MEJ),36 using NVivo 12TM software and will be fully reported elsewhere.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312118822927 · Cited by 1,869
Smith, B. (2018) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2017.1393221 · Cited by 1,189
Keyser, A. D., Verleye, K., Lemon, K. N., Keiningham, T. L., & Klaus, P. (2020) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670520928390 · Cited by 511
An assessment of community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands
McNamara, K. E., Clissold, R., Westoby, R., Piggott-McKellar, A. E., Kumar, R., Clarke, T., Namoumou, F., Areki, F., Joseph, E., Warrick, O., et al. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1 · Cited by 282
Johnson, R. B. (2015) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689815607692 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Pryce, J., Spencer, R., & Walsh, J.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4297446819
- Cited by
- 1,370
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 242 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 178 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 72.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ecommons.luc.edu
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Keywords
- qualitative research, history of qualitative research, research ethics, arts-based research, online research, area studies, museology, disaster research, mixed methods, participatory research, community-based research, qualitative data analysis, qualitative interpretation, research evaluation, politics of research, public scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.001.0001
- The paper
- Pryce, J., Spencer, R., & Walsh, J. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.001.0001